How would you vote on the Massachusetts upskirt photos ban? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 01:53:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  How would you vote on the Massachusetts upskirt photos ban? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: How would you vote on the Massachusetts upskirt photos ban?
#1
Aye (D)		  
#2
Nay (D)		  
#3
Aye (R)		  
#4
Nay (R)		  
#5
Aye (I/third party)		  
#6
Nay (I/third party)		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 75

Author Topic: How would you vote on the Massachusetts upskirt photos ban?  (Read 2486 times)
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,641
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09
« on: March 10, 2014, 11:28:46 PM »
Actually conflicted. On the one hand, this sort of behavior should definitely be illegal, but on the other hand I feel like it's probably covered by preexisting sexual harassment law and having a specific law is probably an invitation to frivolous lawsuits. Lean Aye (R ), but would like to know some context of why this is being brought up now in MA. Didn't vote.
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,641
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2014, 09:18:20 PM »
Quote from: nclib on March 11, 2014, 06:01:31 PM
Quote from: Vosem on March 10, 2014, 11:28:46 PM
having a specific law is probably an invitation to frivolous lawsuits.

How so? Do you mean that someone takes a picture without ill intent, and it happens to show underwear/buttcrack/cleavage/etc., and that person sues?

Pretty much, yeah. BRTD's post led me to vote Aye (R ), but I'm still not 100% sold.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.023 seconds with 12 queries.