Iowa Caucus Results Thread (pg 148 - full results) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 09:38:09 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2020 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, YE)
  Iowa Caucus Results Thread (pg 148 - full results) (search mode)
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]
Author Topic: Iowa Caucus Results Thread (pg 148 - full results)  (Read 153611 times)
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #150 on: February 06, 2020, 09:04:10 PM »

I assume this count hasn't fixed any of the previously noticed errors.

It does not, I don't think is resolves the satellite SDE question either.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #151 on: February 06, 2020, 10:09:09 PM »

Wow! Reuters actually decided to call the race.



Not good!
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #152 on: February 07, 2020, 10:51:26 AM »

Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #153 on: February 07, 2020, 12:12:13 PM »

Doesn't look like anyone will file a Request for a Recanvass here so expect Major Networks calling the Race for Buttigieg after 1pm ET.

Oh well. Letting this go is the smart thing for the Sanders campaign to do: he's already won based on the popular vote and trying to contest the SDEs would just be petty. Let Pete have his little moment.

I'm just annoyed that the historical record will forever contain numbers that are riddled with errors, but oh well. That was probably true of previous caucus results as well.

Let's just hope this kills the traditonal caucus as we know it. At the bare minimum a state should have to do a firehouse caucus or a party run primary.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #154 on: February 07, 2020, 12:32:17 PM »

Let's just hope this kills the traditonal caucus as we know it. At the bare minimum a state should have to do a firehouse caucus or a party run primary.

Yeah. I like the spirit of caucuses, and I think it's useful to open the primaries cycle with one as a way to gauge people's preferences in a deeper way than just casting ballots, but the process needs to be completely overhauled. Maybe implementing full-on RCV would be a good place to start.


What “rule”? Being the “winner is an arbitrary distinction”; it’s not like how the electoral college actually makes you president, it’s just an odd way of apportioning delegates. Bernie got more votes in both alignments.

Yeah, there is no such thing as a winner "by the rules" because the rules do not exist for the sake of designating a winner.

This is what Wyoming is doing this year.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #155 on: February 07, 2020, 03:47:25 PM »

They removed their caucus information and data from their website:

https://iowademocrats.org/2020-caucuses/
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #156 on: February 07, 2020, 04:37:30 PM »


Was going to make a 2016 vs 2020 turnout map (found 2016 attendence data!), but I guess I can't now, until they put it back up. NBC doesn't have the sattelite sites.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #157 on: February 08, 2020, 09:20:10 PM »

What could go wrong?

Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #158 on: February 09, 2020, 12:43:04 PM »


How is this Tom Perez’s fault though?

Everything is always Tom Perez's fault.
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #159 on: February 09, 2020, 06:48:02 PM »

Official delegate tally:

Buttigieg: 14
Sanders: 12
Warren: 8
Biden: 6
Klobuchar: 1
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #160 on: February 09, 2020, 07:08:32 PM »

There was meh turnout improvement compared to 2016, but you got to like these numbers if you are Cindy Axne:

District   2016 Turnout   2020 Turnout   % Change   # Change
1   42,302   41,688   -1.45%   -614
2   49,493   48,835   -1.33%   -658
3   49,024   54,762   11.70%   5,738
4   30,471   29,952   -1.70%   -519
Logged
Gass3268
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,579
United States


« Reply #161 on: February 09, 2020, 07:28:25 PM »


How is this Tom Perez’s fault though?

Everything is always Tom Perez's fault.

He's the party chair. At the very least the Iowa state chair should resign, there needs to be accountability and consequences for this mess.

Totally agree about the Iowa chair.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 [7]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.045 seconds with 13 queries.