Was Calvin Coolidge a good President? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 04:17:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Was Calvin Coolidge a good President? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Was Calvin Coolidge a good President?
#1
Yes (D)
 
#2
Yes (R)
 
#3
Yes (I)
 
#4
No (D)
 
#5
No (R)
 
#6
No (I)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 70

Author Topic: Was Calvin Coolidge a good President?  (Read 4455 times)
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


« on: May 24, 2015, 02:19:48 AM »

Yes he was.

He was very much a gilded age President in hindsight.  Not much lauded or loved by most of his day but he was very successful. A lot like Chester Arthur was, but Coolidge was way more successful than most people credit him for. In terms of accomplishments he was majorly successful and deserves to be in the high regard among GOP Presidents.

He was the epitome of the laissez faire attitude. He didn't care about interfering with things he let them play out and that proved the right decision. By lowering the tax rates and letting industry grow the nation prospered for it. Sure he made mistakes but to blame him solely for the depression? That's ridiculous.  If anyone in particular to blame for the depression Presidency wise it's Hoover because he made the situation far worse with the tariff and tax rate increases.

Coolidge's character outshines everything. Unlike Billy C or Obama who were social and media butterflies Coolidge was to use a cheesy phrase "the OG of the Cool cats.." He didn't care for the life of the President, in fact he was probably one of our more Private Presidents. He lost a lot of his wind out of his sails due to the death of his son. If that hadn't have happened who knows what would have happened with him he could have easily ran again if he wanted too. The death made his depression much worse and his attitude more dim. It would have been interesting seeing him handle the depression.

Harding was a fine President too but the weaker second choice was in hindsight the star move the Republicans made in '20.
Logged
Dancing with Myself
tb75
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,941
United States


« Reply #1 on: May 26, 2015, 12:46:51 AM »

Yes he was.

He was very much a gilded age President in hindsight.  Not much lauded or loved by most of his day but he was very successful. A lot like Chester Arthur was, but Coolidge was way more successful than most people credit him for. In terms of accomplishments he was majorly successful and deserves to be in the high regard among GOP Presidents.

He was the epitome of the laissez faire attitude. He didn't care about interfering with things he let them play out and that proved the right decision. By lowering the tax rates and letting industry grow the nation prospered for it. Sure he made mistakes but to blame him solely for the depression? That's ridiculous.  If anyone in particular to blame for the depression Presidency wise it's Hoover because he made the situation far worse with the tariff and tax rate increases.

Coolidge's character outshines everything. Unlike Billy C or Obama who were social and media butterflies Coolidge was to use a cheesy phrase "the OG of the Cool cats.." He didn't care for the life of the President, in fact he was probably one of our more Private Presidents. He lost a lot of his wind out of his sails due to the death of his son. If that hadn't have happened who knows what would have happened with him he could have easily ran again if he wanted too. The death made his depression much worse and his attitude more dim. It would have been interesting seeing him handle the depression.

Harding was a fine President too but the weaker second choice was in hindsight the star move the Republicans made in '20.

He doesn't get sole blame for the Depression, but to parade around saying that his laissez-faire approach was an accomplishment when in fact it not only allowed but actively enabled for the greatest disaster in this nation's history to occur is disgusting historical revisionism.

I wasn't parading or bragging about anything .I was just describing the guy, he was the epitome of that attitude. I could easily say the same about FDR being the pinnacle of liberalism or TR being the pinnacle of Progressive. It's a label to describe the man.  I don't agree with that philosophy overall so I'm not trying to make it sound so good but I'm not taking props away from Calvin either because he got the job done when it comes down to it. He was in charge when the economy in the basic realm was solid and stable. That in my opinion anyways defines a successful president. That's the purpose of this thread, opinions.

Yes L-faire in hindsight is an easy choice to blame but it was the norm to govern then.  Could have done better domestically? Yes he definitely could have. No arguments from me there.

That's all I have to say about this.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.