Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 11:05:32 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Lieberman-Lamont Showdown: The Results are coming in  (Read 50640 times)
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,802
United States


« on: August 08, 2006, 02:11:10 PM »


Me too, Lieberman is milking the fact that his "strong on security" ass couldn't secure a webserver for all its worth. If someone other than Lieberman took down the site, they should have realized that this would really help Lieberman.

I'm sorry but does anyone really care about that? Anyone who votes either way based on that needs their head checked out.

So you don't care how secure you are? You support Lamont so I guess you don't, if he had his way Iraq would be destroyed by terrorists and the US would be in more danger than it is now.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,802
United States


« Reply #1 on: August 08, 2006, 02:25:19 PM »


Me too, Lieberman is milking the fact that his "strong on security" ass couldn't secure a webserver for all its worth. If someone other than Lieberman took down the site, they should have realized that this would really help Lieberman.

I'm sorry but does anyone really care about that? Anyone who votes either way based on that needs their head checked out.

So you don't care how secure you are? You support Lamont so I guess you don't, if he had his way Iraq would be destroyed by terrorists and the US would be in more danger than it is now.

Instead of bothering to rip apart this absurd comment, I will simply point out that I was referring to people coming out and voting for or against Liberman based on the fact that his website is down.

The "ripping apart" would be saying I'm wrong and how you're right. Not much that can come out of that.
Logged
MasterJedi
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 23,802
United States


« Reply #2 on: August 08, 2006, 06:20:17 PM »

Lamont            53%
Lieberman       47%

Another nail in the coffin of Democratic moderation.


It's safe to assume than that you supported Specter in 2004?

... and Linc Chafee now?  In fact, which way will you vote (if at all) in the primary, Winfield?

With those cases you should look to see who can win. I'd prefer both their challangers but since they both probably wouldn't win I'd have voted for Specter and Chafee. Lieberman can win if he wins the primary and he can probably win even if he lost, the difference is in that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 10 queries.