Freedom to Enjoy Oneself in Public Act (Law'd)

[#CriminalizeSobriety]

Considering we abolished the federal drinking age and left it to the regions, any chance we could strike the age requirements?

[#CriminalizeSobriety]

Considering we abolished the federal drinking age and left it to the regions, any chance we could strike the age requirements?

As far as I know, the federal government still sets the drinking age in DC and the territories, and we've set it at 18.

I totally missed the first clause... I don't know why.

Assuming that either of the following statute, or a similar version, is currently in effect for DC and the territories:

http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2917.11  (see Paragraph B)

How would the repeal of public intoxication statutes as proposed here affect this statute?

Well, I don't see anything in this bill giving one excuse to

You must be logged in to read this quote.

[#CriminalizeSobriety]

Considering we abolished the federal drinking age and left it to the regions, any chance we could strike the age requirements?

As far as I know, the federal government still sets the drinking age in DC and the territories, and we've set it at 18.

I totally missed the first clause... I don't know why.

Assuming that either of the following statute, or a similar version, is currently in effect for DC and the territories:

http://codes.ohio.gov/orc/2917.11  (see Paragraph B)

How would the repeal of public intoxication statutes as proposed here affect this statute?

Well, I don't see anything in this bill giving one excuse to

You must be logged in to read this quote.

But generally statutes like this are the local public intoxication statutes. I have little doubt DC and the territories would be the same.

What if there were a clause to the effect of "Nothing in this Act shall be construed as allowing disorderly conduct."?

[#CriminalizeSobriety]

Aye.