Frankly, there are too many "What Ifs" in attempting to determine the query posed in this thread. To wit:
1. In another thread herein I have previously postulated the ramifications of the
BC Constitution Act, which only permits a majority vote of members of the House on any matter to receive royal assent. Speaker's vote not relevant on 3rd reading thereto. The BC Clerk of the legislature has already alluded to same in his diatribe at the opening of the current legislative session back in June. BTW, BC is the only province having its own so-called "Constitution Act".
2. The GreeNDP accord specifically states therein that "budget bills" are not "confidence votes". What if the Libs/Greens defeat a BC NDP budget? Normally, a defeat of a budget bill equates to non-confidence in gov't in the Westminster system. Even constitutional expert Philippe Lagassé has written that his major concern is that the BC NDP will state such a defeat will be a "non-confidence" matter leading to turmoil.
3. Previously in opposition, Saanich South BC NDP MLA Lana Popham stated that she would quit the BC NDP caucus if the BC NDP supported BC Hydro's Site C dam according to G & M's Justine Hunter. BTW, Justine Hunter has impeccable credentials and stands by her BC NDP caucus source.
In that vein, the GreeNDP gov't has now, on very narrow terms of reference, put BC Hydro's Site C matter to the BCUC for determination. By all accounts, that ToR will likely result in the BCUC approving continuation of the Site C dam, which has majority BC public opinion approval. Final determination will be made by BC NDP cabinet and Lana Popham is now the BC Agriculture minister. If the BC NDP cabinet agrees to permit Site C to proceed will Popham quit cabinet/caucus on principle as she previously stated?
4. Both Horgan and the Green's Weaver are egotistical "alpha males". Weaver is lambasting the NDP in the media re: recent Grizzly Bear trophy hunt ban, changes to labour relations code, etc., etc. Does anyone think this social partnership has longevity?
5. About 6 weeks after the May, 2017 election, both Ipsos and Mainstreet held that the BC Libs had 6% and 11% leads over the BC NDP respectively (compared to virtual tie just before e-day). Since then, the BC NDP gov't has been involved in quite a few controversial issues. Will the BC NDP downward slide continue toward year-end?
6. In the BC Lib leadership thread, I had a detailed post about Dianne Watts as potential CC replacement. If that's the case, will be a BC poli game-changer IMHO. Since then, Province political columnist Mike Smyth thinks "she's in".
7. With CC resigning her Kelowna seat, one would think the BC NDP couldn't care less about a by-election, right now, that may potentially be 6-months out. So why, today, is BC NDP telling the media that they want their 2017 candidate to be their by-election candidate, if it's so far off? (BTW, in terms of by-elections, local constituencies typically take direction from HQ).
http://www.kelownadailycourier.ca/news/article_a694532a-8308-11e7-a322-7f8654c28395.html8. Hypothetically speaking, if a Watts-led BC Lib party, next spring, enjoys a, let's say, 20% lead in opinion polls consistently, will the BC Greens continue to support the BC NDP? One would think that the BC Greens would "not want to wear" any major drop in BC NDP support.
I can go on and on re: soooo many potential "What Ifs?"
Nevertheless I am fairly certain that the current GreeNDP gov't should carry this stamp: