Demjanjuk Trial (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 11:23:30 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Demjanjuk Trial (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Show or Substance
#1
Show
 
#2
Substance
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 13

Author Topic: Demjanjuk Trial  (Read 2060 times)
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


« on: July 13, 2009, 11:48:03 PM »

(Crouches from PC backlash for saying this and yes if I were to run for a lot of local offices near me, I realize as a Democrat I need Jewish votes, BUT....)

SHOW.  The man's well in his 80s and near dead.  It's not like he was a mastermind or high ranking Nazi official.  He was merely a guard following orders in a time of war.  We should not be bothering with this guy.  Let him die in peace. 
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


« Reply #1 on: July 14, 2009, 12:07:07 AM »

There may be good reason to send him to prison, but the trial is all about Show. Since WW2, Germany has a complex in which they always need to show how "changed" they are from those days.

A lot of Eastern European and some other peoples collaborated with Hitler to merely survive or help themselves out- Slovakia, Hungary, Finland, Romania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Bosnia along with aid from some Irish, Spanish, Lithuanian and Ukrainian people.  Sweden also traded a lot of iron ore to the Reich.  IIRC, Demjanjuk was taken as a child laborer initially then moved up to guard.  I'm thinking Mr. Demajanjuk's service was merely for protection.  Going after people this late in the game is just senseless.  I'm far from a Holocaust denier, but it's nearly as bad as me asking the British goverment or blacks asking Southern landowners for reparations.  Nuremberg's out of the way and the worst of the criminals got what they deserved.  It's over! 
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


« Reply #2 on: July 14, 2009, 02:09:27 PM »

There may be good reason to send him to prison, but the trial is all about Show. Since WW2, Germany has a complex in which they always need to show how "changed" they are from those days.

Yes, but if he was just a guard why charge him with 29,000 counts? Christ, I hate defending a f'king Nazi but if he was just a soldier, let him be. Should we go around charging all former enemy soldiers of allied nations?

That is why I agree that he deserves to go to prison, but cannot deny that the trial and everything about it (including the number of counts) is a show.

There is the issue of ex post facto and the idea that it was different times, but at the same time we can't simply accept that you did horrible things and can get off scott free because you're old and will die soon anyway.

Do we really need to "set an example" in this case though?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 13 queries.