Dropping the atomic bombs vs. an American invasion of Japan (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 25, 2024, 08:59:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Dropping the atomic bombs vs. an American invasion of Japan (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which would have been more preferable to you?
#1
An American invasion of the home islands
 
#2
The dropping of the atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki?
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 139

Author Topic: Dropping the atomic bombs vs. an American invasion of Japan  (Read 28110 times)
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


« on: March 23, 2009, 11:45:55 AM »
« edited: March 23, 2009, 11:48:13 AM by ICE HOCKEY »

Option 2.  We had to do it.  This is one case I don't understand some of the extreme liberals.  Japanese brutality up to that point well warranted what we did.  More people would have suffered had we not dropped the bombs.

On a side note my grandfather was in the amphibious unit in the Navy and never got deployed.  My aunts were already born, but my dad wasn't until 1950.  Had they not dropped the bomb, he might have been sent and a very good chance I wouldn't be here.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2009, 10:33:47 PM »
« Edited: March 23, 2009, 10:40:05 PM by ICE HOCKEY »

Option 2.  We had to do it.  This is one case I don't understand some of the extreme liberals.  Japanese brutality up to that point well warranted what we did.  More people would have suffered had we not dropped the bombs.

On a side note my grandfather was in the amphibious unit in the Navy and never got deployed.  My aunts were already born, but my dad wasn't until 1950.  Had they not dropped the bomb, he might have been sent and a very good chance I wouldn't be here.

So, the lives of servicemen are worth more than the lives of innocent civilians?

In this case.. yes.  Ever see the Rape of Nanking?  These Japanese were brutal and honored death.  They did not care about the civilian population of their conquered population at all.  They were sick s- bayoneting babies and "comfort stations".  Yeah, they had to be dealt with appropriately.  Even as a moderate liberal Democrat I feel there are times where we have to use force, sometimes excessive even if it's against innocent civilians.  The Japanese would not surrender otherwise and there was no other solution for humanity's sake than to drop both bombs.  The threat of total annihilation was the only thing that would have swayed the Emperor.

This is where I'm a little Truman-esque.
Logged
TeePee4Prez
Flyers2004
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,479


« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2009, 11:00:11 AM »

Still, it is great that Japan has risen from the ashes and become an extremely prosperous and quite possibly the most technologically advanced society in the world, all under peaceful times.  Hiroshima and Nagasaki were testaments to the horrors that human innovation can bring, and postwar Japan is a testament to the wonders it can bring.

Yes, but it's a shame the Japanese govt was never properly punished for their actions during the war.

We actually agree on something other than Ireland.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 14 queries.