Opinion of Bush's 2006 State of the Union Address (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 10:29:52 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Opinion of Bush's 2006 State of the Union Address (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Positive or negative?
#1
(R) Positive
 
#2
(R) Negative
 
#3
(D) Positive
 
#4
(D) Negative
 
#5
(O) Positive
 
#6
(O) Negative
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 40

Author Topic: Opinion of Bush's 2006 State of the Union Address  (Read 4983 times)
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« on: January 31, 2006, 10:48:54 PM »

Sorry, I should explain my last post.  This keyword bingo card is brought to you by the DNC:

Link (Click on 'bingo cards')

And I'm not actually drunk; I was just playing on the drinking game craze that has emerged every time Bush makes a speech.

That's interesting, because it was a Richard Nixon SOTU drinking game that got Bush in trouble in the first place.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« Reply #1 on: February 01, 2006, 12:27:50 AM »

Aside from the fact that we've yet to land on Mars, it was an ok speech.

But it does signal the end of libertarianism as a meaningful force in the Bush White House.  For libertarian-conservatives, the House leadership race is big big big time now.  If Blunt wins, they are going to be completely shut out.  If its Boehner or Shadegg, you have something to be happy about.
Logged
The Duke
JohnD.Ford
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,270


Political Matrix
E: 0.13, S: -1.23

« Reply #2 on: February 01, 2006, 12:36:03 AM »

Aside from the fact that we've yet to land on Mars, it was an ok speech.

But it does signal the end of libertarianism as a meaningful force in the Bush White House.  For libertarian-conservatives, the House leadership race is big big big time now.  If Blunt wins, they are going to be completely shut out.  If its Boehner or Shadegg, you have something to be happy about.

There's only 1 libertarian Republican in the House.

Ron Paul, I presume?  You have a very narrow definition of libertarian.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.