How Would Kerry Have Handled the Iraq War? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 12:35:00 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History
  Alternative History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  How Would Kerry Have Handled the Iraq War? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: How Would Kerry Have Handled the Iraq War?  (Read 3055 times)
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« on: June 28, 2010, 06:45:38 AM »

Well let's see. In 2002 he said it would be foolish to ignore the threat. In 2004 he said he voted for the $87 billion before he voted against it. Then in the weeks leading up to the election, he said that he wouldn't have invaded. I'm not sure Kerry even knows how he would've handled Iraq.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« Reply #1 on: July 02, 2010, 12:18:07 AM »

Well let's see. In 2002 he said it would be foolish to ignore the threat. In 2004 he said he voted for the $87 billion before he voted against it. Then in the weeks leading up to the election, he said that he wouldn't have invaded. I'm not sure Kerry even knows how he would've handled Iraq.

That's why I'm asking you.

Well combining all of Kerry's statements, he would have gone to the UN, then not gone to war. Then he would send our troops in anyhow and ask for support. The UN would say no and so he'd bring us back home. After seeing that Saddam still wasn't cooperating with sanctions, he'd send our troops back in and after Baghdad fell, he'd pull us out until after his reelection. His next move would be to send our troops back to Iraq. Sounds like alot of his other positions.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« Reply #2 on: July 12, 2010, 07:30:53 PM »

Well let's see. In 2002 he said it would be foolish to ignore the threat. In 2004 he said he voted for the $87 billion before he voted against it. Then in the weeks leading up to the election, he said that he wouldn't have invaded. I'm not sure Kerry even knows how he would've handled Iraq.

That's why I'm asking you.

Well combining all of Kerry's statements, he would have gone to the UN, then not gone to war. Then he would send our troops in anyhow and ask for support. The UN would say no and so he'd bring us back home. After seeing that Saddam still wasn't cooperating with sanctions, he'd send our troops back in and after Baghdad fell, he'd pull us out until after his reelection. His next move would be to send our troops back to Iraq. Sounds like alot of his other positions.

I meant after 2004, since Kerry would have only been inaugurated in January 2005. That was after the invasion.

I know that's what I was referring to. He would've gone back and forth and kept changing his mind. One month we'd be there and another month we'd be back.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« Reply #3 on: July 13, 2010, 09:06:59 PM »

Well let's see. In 2002 he said it would be foolish to ignore the threat. In 2004 he said he voted for the $87 billion before he voted against it. Then in the weeks leading up to the election, he said that he wouldn't have invaded. I'm not sure Kerry even knows how he would've handled Iraq.

That's why I'm asking you.

Well combining all of Kerry's statements, he would have gone to the UN, then not gone to war. Then he would send our troops in anyhow and ask for support. The UN would say no and so he'd bring us back home. After seeing that Saddam still wasn't cooperating with sanctions, he'd send our troops back in and after Baghdad fell, he'd pull us out until after his reelection. His next move would be to send our troops back to Iraq. Sounds like alot of his other positions.

I meant after 2004, since Kerry would have only been inaugurated in January 2005. That was after the invasion.

I know that's what I was referring to. He would've gone back and forth and kept changing his mind. One month we'd be there and another month we'd be back.

This is why I don't take you as a serious poster.

What's not serious about it? I'm going right off of Kerry's exact statements about Iraq and how inconsistent they were.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« Reply #4 on: July 22, 2010, 05:42:59 PM »

Kerry was either lying by saying he could get foreign troops to help because no one likes the US enough to lend a hand. He was either lying or full of himself. He would've changed his position as president too going back and forth. He'd blame Bush if there was a problem and take credit if things went well.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,615
United States


« Reply #5 on: August 04, 2010, 10:21:24 PM »

Kerry was either lying by saying he could get foreign troops to help because no one likes the US enough to lend a hand. He was either lying or full of himself. He would've changed his position as president too going back and forth. He'd blame Bush if there was a problem and take credit if things went well.

All politicians take credit if things go well or blame others if things go badly.

He would have pulled us out, sent us back, pulled us out, and sent us back again because he is a notorious flip flopper.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.