New Hampshire Primary (January 23) Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 04:15:41 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  2024 U.S. Presidential Election (Moderators: Likely Voter, GeorgiaModerate, KoopaDaQuick 🇵🇸)
  New Hampshire Primary (January 23) Megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: New Hampshire Primary (January 23) Megathread  (Read 17324 times)
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« on: January 23, 2024, 03:03:08 PM »

I’ll go against the grain here a bit. I think that the increased GOP “turnout” (or uptake, more likely) we’re seeing is indeed good for Haley, but bad for Biden. Granted, I don’t think much should be gleaned from Biden’s performance here no matter the results.

I'd argue the opposite. You'd imagine undeclared voters who would normally vote in the dem primary would be more likely to vote for Philips or Williamson.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #1 on: January 23, 2024, 03:24:20 PM »

Has turnout analysis ever proved correct ?

No, but it sure is fun
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #2 on: January 23, 2024, 05:47:56 PM »

Klobmentum 2: The Haley-ing
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #3 on: January 23, 2024, 06:08:53 PM »



Hmmmm......
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #4 on: January 23, 2024, 06:47:31 PM »


ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC all use Edison.

Fox News uses AP vote cast(along with the Associated Press)
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #5 on: January 23, 2024, 06:51:08 PM »

ABC, CBS, CNN and NBC all use Edison.

Fox New uses AP vote cast(along with the Associated Press)

Yeah, AP is better than Edison. AP/Fox split off from Edison after Edison has garbage exit polls in previous elections. IIRC the impetus for the change was the miss in 2016 being so bad.

Exit polls weren't great in 2020 either, from either provider.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #6 on: January 23, 2024, 07:14:37 PM »

"Unprocessed write-ins" up with 75.3% in the dem primary.

I assume the majority of that is Biden.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #7 on: January 23, 2024, 07:22:11 PM »


Joe you've shocked the nation.

Makes all those Politico articles seem abit silly in hindsight.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #8 on: January 23, 2024, 07:27:22 PM »

Dean Phillips is winning Farmington, but I imagine that's because they haven't included any write-ins yet(which is at 0).
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #9 on: January 23, 2024, 07:32:14 PM »

Why would Democrats vote for Haley in a primary? Wouldn't you want Biden to have the weakest possible opponent in the fall? That is unquestionably Trump.

Haley doesn't have 91 criminal indictments and over half the country violently hating her guts. If Haley were nominated the election would end up being a referendum on Biden, his age, the economy, etc.

Did none of the Democrats pay attention to 2022 or are they still just shell shocked and terrified by 2016? Seriously, Trump and his brand of politics are weak in a general election.


Because they think Trump is going to end democracy, and don't want any risk at all because they are afraid he will create a dictatorship if he wins.

It's partially that, but a lot of moderates would rather just have a normal republican over Trump, or Biden for that matter.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #10 on: January 23, 2024, 07:40:17 PM »

A new category just popped up seperate from "Unprocessed Write-Ins", "Other Write-ins".

So I imagine "Other" are other write-in names and "Unprocessed" is Joe.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #11 on: January 23, 2024, 07:43:11 PM »

Van Jones once again on one again on CNN, saying how it's a warning sign for Democrats that Republicans are "not afraid of Biden" and that they're okay with putting Trump up despite his issues.

I guarantee Republican voters who are still with Trump don't care whether or not they're afraid of Biden or not. These are the people who believe Trump won in 2020 and will beat whoever is the Dem nominee.

Those voters aren't afraid of Biden because they believe his win wasn't legitimate and Trump already beat him.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #12 on: January 23, 2024, 07:59:54 PM »

The needle is live
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #13 on: January 23, 2024, 08:07:32 PM »

Another great night for the president. Thank you!

Yes, a good showing for Biden.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #14 on: January 23, 2024, 08:10:07 PM »

Most boring primaries ever.

Also it looks like polls are pretty accurate so far this year. Which should concern Biden supporters.

Polls clearly underestimated Haley, and Biden for that matter. I don't think I saw a single poll with him over 70%.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #15 on: January 23, 2024, 09:34:08 PM »

Some of those CNN percentages look off.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #16 on: January 24, 2024, 12:20:32 PM »

Found on twitter:

Quote
Durham, New Hampshire

Phillips 214
Williamson 93
Vermin Supreme 12
Others 46

Write-ins
Biden 1210
Ceasefire 71
Haley 21
Robert Kennedy 10
Whitmer 4
Buttigieg 4
West 4
Michelle Obama 3
Trump 3
Haya 2
Claudia de La Cruz 2
Al Gore 1
Ilhan Omar 1
Hunter Biden 1
Phoebe Bridgers 1
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #17 on: January 24, 2024, 12:35:12 PM »

Also, are we going to talk about how the polling average overestimated Trump? This of course I believe was due more to a last minute surge of Indies wading into the GOP primary, which was a bit unpredictable in terms of share (even 1% or 2% more or less would change things a few pts) but I do think there is an argument to be made for the whole "Trump always outperforms his polling" when he has now underperformed his polling twice now this cycle.

On the other hand, the Exit polls had Trump + 3.5%, so there is further evidence for the thesis that Exit Polls always underestimate Donald Trump. Which also confirms that "traditional" polling methods do. Of course, a lot of pollsters in response are producing polls that deviate from traditional practices for their public releases, but there isn't much evidence the underlying situation has changed since 2016. There is still a shy Trump voter, it is just some pollsters correct it in bizzarre ways.

The 2020 exit polls overestimated Trump.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #18 on: January 24, 2024, 12:48:50 PM »


@emailking beat you to it by about 10 hours.

I think closer to 60 than 70. Should be 64 if the same take from unprocessed holds and I mathed that right.
Logged
Birdish
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 760
United States


« Reply #19 on: January 25, 2024, 03:16:46 AM »

I'd imagine a good chunk of those 4600 Haley voters in the dem primary were hoping it would crossover and actually count in the Rep primary.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.039 seconds with 12 queries.