Will he dare declare? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 15, 2024, 10:39:12 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2008 Elections
  Will he dare declare? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Will the Obama speech tonight be a declaration of victory?
#1
Yes
#2
No
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: Will he dare declare?  (Read 2303 times)
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

« on: May 20, 2008, 10:45:12 AM »

unless he has 2209 delegates at the end of the evening, he shouldnt.

he should stick to the platitudes and the pie-in-the-sky fantasy land sh**t he usually talks about.

i hope hillary speaks first so i can turn off my tv.

Hillary is the one that is living in a fantasy world. There is no way shw will win.
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

« Reply #1 on: May 20, 2008, 12:29:23 PM »

unless he has 2209 delegates at the end of the evening, he shouldnt.

he should stick to the platitudes and the pie-in-the-sky fantasy land sh**t he usually talks about.

i hope hillary speaks first so i can turn off my tv.

Walter, what is your take on Michigan?  Should Clinton get every single vote and delegate and leave Obama out in the cold completely because he took his name off the ballot?  That seems to be what Terry McAuliffe thinks should happen.

I think the biggest reason why Clinton and her fine folks are advocating this is because it only helps her and hurts Obama.  If it were the other way around, or if it were a split state between the two, then she wouldn't advocate it as strongly.

Anyway, he shouldn't declare victory tonight, and I don't think he will.  He has to wait until she ends her campaign, which I hope she does on Wednesday, June 4.

michigan should have had a re-vote.  period.

pretty clever strategy by obama.  he took his name off the ballot, because he knew he was going to lose anyway.  that way hed be able to whine about his name not being on the ballot if there were ever talk of counting those delegates.

i wouldnt have been opposed to a re-vote in florida either.  the only condition for a re-vote would be that the tax payers do NOT foot the bill for either one. 

Obama would have won MI like he won WI. Clinton could even get out of the 50% with no one on the ballot but her. Please take your Clinton hack comments somewhere else.
Logged
Josh/Devilman88
josh4bush
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,079
Political Matrix
E: 3.61, S: -1.74

« Reply #2 on: May 20, 2008, 12:52:29 PM »

josh werent you a clinton supporter the week before the nc primary?

oh but youre back on the bandwagon again!  CUZ HE IS A WINNER!!11

I was never a Clinton supporter, I did say she has some good views on things. I mean Clinton and Obama almost have the same views, and I would have voted for her if it wasn't for the gas hoilday view of hers. But unlike you I am no hack of one cadidate, and to say Obama would have lost to Clinton in MI when she didn't even make it out of the 50% with no one on the ballot but her is kinda stupid.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 13 queries.