Opinion of Reconstruction-era Radical Republicans (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 03:00:45 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Opinion of Reconstruction-era Radical Republicans (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
FFs (D)
 
#2
HP (D)
 
#3
FFs (R)
 
#4
HP (D)
 
#5
FFs (I/O)
 
#6
HP (I/O)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 39

Author Topic: Opinion of Reconstruction-era Radical Republicans  (Read 1034 times)
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« on: February 02, 2013, 05:56:30 PM »
« edited: February 02, 2013, 05:59:31 PM by CountryFree »

Mixed Bag (Independent)

On one hand they helped implement some very needed reforms like well ahead of it's time Civil Rights for nonwhite citizens.  I don't see that happening under the regime of more moderate/conservative Republicans who would've likely waffled on the issue due to possible massive repercussions from Southern whites.

However, at the same time I feel like Reconstruction could've been better handled than it did.  For instance, maybe avoiding all out military governance in some states would've prevented a good deal of resentment.  As would, I imagine, cracking down on some of the corruption that was all too common in many Republican governments during the era (which isn't to say Democratic governments weren't corrupt, as the legacy of urban machinery and mob involvement in politics shows).

So really, it's kind of hard to say whether they are FFs or HPs based off of that.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 9 queries.