Huckabee unleashes on GOP Establishment - Could he go rogue at RNC? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 13, 2024, 12:37:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Huckabee unleashes on GOP Establishment - Could he go rogue at RNC? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Huckabee unleashes on GOP Establishment - Could he go rogue at RNC?  (Read 9170 times)
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« on: August 24, 2012, 11:20:26 AM »
« edited: August 24, 2012, 11:42:11 AM by James Badass Monroe »

Considering how Huckabee handled the Republican Primaries (aka "not running for President) I severely doubt he would "go rogue".  Like someone else on here mentioned, he had ample opportunity to stand up to the "establishment" and he did nothing.  He decided that high cable ratings was more important than going against the Rombot.  Huckabee is merely saying what he said to drum up the necessary fifteen minutes of fame to get more ratings for the next few months during elections season.  At the very best he will tease the audience with possibilities and crazy scenarios, but he won't leave.  As much as Republicans truly despise each other they won't turn their backs on the national ticket whole hog when the Kenyan Muslim Socialist Atheist is still president.

As it regards Akin I would expect some blowback, but nothing that would exceed the usual "THAT'S NOT FAIR!" criticism from the 10% who aren't overjoyed with the decision.  Oh, and the liberals who WANT Akin to stay in the race, naturally.  Now it's just a waiting game of when Akin runs out of money and some MO Republican can run a write-in campaign (or if he drops out soon enough, replace him as the GOP candidate).  Hopefully for the GOP Akin runs out of money before October or the final month crunch or whatever you want to call it.  Heavens know that they wouldn't be too pleased about losing some votes to a compromised candidate.

As for the chances now, not so sure.  Whereas some more rational candidate would've performed better before, the GOP is still tainted.  The fact that the GOP DID nominate a candidate like Akin, even if they changed their minds after a few weeks, has got to be on the minds of a few Missourians.  This is like committing a grave offense to a person and then apologizing, expecting everything to suddenly be okay and them to totally forget what you did.  Things can't just be thrown under a bus, kicked to the curb, dropped off at the Cleaners, or left under the bridge.  The GOP needs to do more than just nominate a "polite" politician, they need one with a new image.  You can't keep Rachel Dawes and simply replace the actress, you need a Selina Kyle to keep things interesting.

As for blocking nutter candidates, where the hell was the RNC the past few election cycles?

EDIT: Yes, I did edit this post just to throw in a Batman analogy.
Logged
Mechaman
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,791
Jamaica
« Reply #1 on: August 26, 2012, 05:36:34 AM »

Great comment by Huck. This party better learn to keep all three major ideological factions of the party together under one roof or we are in for some very dark days.

But, like usual, we will have to hear from those in the middle or even left leaning about how we have to be a "big tent party"...unless we're talking about social conservatives. They have to go and there shall be no discussion about it. Roll Eyes

Normally I would agree with this sentiment, but not when the idiot in question openly discussed expelling one of the three in his Presidential campaign. He is not for keeping the three together, he is for social con supremacy at the expense of the other three (and even at the expense of their destruction if necessary).

Social conservatives at the back of the bus = "big tent."
Social conservatives at the wheel of the bus = "supremacy."

Got it!

Correct me if I'm wrong but doesn't being "at the wheel" imply somebody is in control?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 14 queries.