BTW, I still wonder why you voted for me.
Maybe States forgot this is about who he would vote for, not who he wants eliminated.
I sometimes make this mistake, after playing the Survivor Board for too long.
Maybe he's still in the April Fool's spirit or something.
I mean really States, have you ever read my posts (especially those in recent history)? I think that besides being pro-choice you would find that you and I probably agree on a lot of issues (especially economic).
BTW, I never knew the word "fag" in any variation was looked down on upon here. Once I came on this forum I started using the word "moralfag" to describe people who would force their views on others, something I'm completely against. Ever since that time "moralfag" has become an accepted word around here (though I give credit to 4chan). For the record I haven't seen that many views of yours that would make me conclude that you are a moralfag (a name like State's Rights implies that you believe in more localized control, something I'm more pro than someone like say Antonio V).
And for the record Antonio, a super far leftist can be a moralfag too. If a politician wanted to force everyone to use environmentally friendly products, ban all guns, restrict religious expression beyond "separation of church and state", regulate free speech on tv and radio, I don't care how much they love gay rights, hate torture, hate the Patriot Act, etc. I would still call that person a "moralfag".
If you want a good example of what a non-conservative moralfag looks like, look no further than the two wastes of space who represent California in the Senate.
Poll
