Economic Schools of thought late 1800's and early 1900's. (user search)

Talk Elections Forum Contact | US Election Atlas Election 2024 Election Results Election Info Atlas Wiki

	Welcome, Guest. Please login or register. Did you miss your activation email? June 08, 2024, 06:35:11 PM

News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

Talk Elections

General Politics

Economics (Moderator: Torie)

Economic Schools of thought late 1800's and early 1900's. (search mode)

Pages: [1]

Poll

Question:

What theory would you have been a disciple of?

#1 Austrian School/Neoclassicalism		13 (56.5%)
#2 German Historical School		4 (17.4%)
#3 English Historical School		3 (13%)
#4 Marxian Economics		3 (13%)

Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 23

Author

Topic: Economic Schools of thought late 1800's and early 1900's. (Read 12258 times)

Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp

Posts: 9,167

Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Re: Economic Schools of thought late 1800's and early 1900's.

« on: August 13, 2009, 08:09:16 PM »

NOTA

Protectionism+pro-worker freedom (read: anti-union)

Logged

Alexander Hamilton
Junior Chimp

Posts: 9,167

Political Matrix
E: 0.58, S: -5.13

Re: Economic Schools of thought late 1800's and early 1900's.

« Reply #1 on: August 14, 2009, 11:48:50 PM »

Quote from: Karma Police on August 14, 2009, 11:47:00 PM

Quote from: Hamilton on August 13, 2009, 08:09:16 PM

NOTA

Protectionism+pro-worker freedom (read: anti-union)

What? This doesn't make any sense. Unions are the main institution in this country promoting Protectionism. No other group really solidly is against Protectionism, if you get rid of them you lose your whole support base. A few half-brain dead farmers is all you'll get solidly on your side.

Anyways Protectionism is stupid in most cases.

It's a nationalistic approach to a pro-growth attitude aimed at expanding the middle class.

Logged

Pages: [1]

Jump to:

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 14 queries.