The longer this argument goes on the more inclined I am to take Libertas's side. At this point it's difficult for me not to think he's being held to a different standard than somebody straighter or more conventionally masculine would be.
That's just nonsense, and it's disappointing that you'd buy into Libertas's frantic spin. What could be more absurdly masculine than attending anonymous orgies? I'd also reiterate how gross it is that Libertas is attempting to frame his attention-seeking posts about his private life as a natural expression of his sexual identity. If I was gay/etc. I'd be pretty offended by that strategy and the assumptions it makes.
Anyway, whatever Snowstalker's arguing, it's obvious that Libertas hasn't changed - and thus should not have been unbanned! - because his ridiculously belligerent, humourless personality remains as evident as ever. Witness as evidence the verbose, infuriated responses to
every single post, to say nothing of the delusional notion that the Forces of Evil are united against him, and Libertas, the innocent victim of an orchestrated campaign of lies (remember when he compared himself to George McGovern running against Nixon?), stands alone, heroically fighting. But I guess he's adopted the "correct" political views now, so it's all fine. Whatever.
As a postscript, the irony here is that
both Snowstalker and Libertas have a pathetic adolescent nostalgia for the "gritty" New York City of the '70s.
Poll
