I was probably one of the biggest Masters boosters, so take what I say with a grain of salt, but I think with a year of hindsight that he’s both underrated and overrated as a candidate here.
I think his chances are underrated in that I still don’t buy the initial narrative that he lost because he was some sort of exceptionally off-putting person with unfixable flaws. I think most people understated Kelly’s strength, and Masters raised almost no money in the general with absolutely no base of support outside Thiel. But overrated because the inability to raise money or support is an absolutely fatal flaw if he can’t fix it.
As someone with some lingering sympathy for him, I wouldn’t advise a run here, since two strikes is probably the ballgame and his flaws can’t be overcome so quickly. This is probably the end for him.
How can anyone be a Masters booster after his terrible social security policy and terrible debate performances ?
The Libertarian actually did a better campaign in Arizona than Masters.