Do you believe in evolution? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 14, 2024, 11:36:30 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Do you believe in evolution? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 110

Author Topic: Do you believe in evolution?  (Read 13797 times)
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« on: May 06, 2010, 06:04:44 PM »

Um, yeah, who doesn't? Weird question.
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« Reply #1 on: May 29, 2010, 11:25:38 PM »

BTW... just to show that I am not one-sided, and never had any intention of being so... there is actually one demonstrable link between the rise of capitalism and the rise of Protestantism, which is this:

The Catholic Church had a traditional ban on usury.  No Catholic was allowed to lend money, or goods, at any type of interest.  While Jews were occasionally placed under this ban, for the most part, Jews were the only people allowed to partake in money lending.  Not that Catholics couldn't lend money, but without interest, they couldn't make it profitable.  It's easy to see how, when Protestants lifted this ban, that helped capitalism move forward.

I'm pretty sure jmf probably didn't even know about that, though, let alone was it anything like what he was talking about.

True, though I wouldn't say the widespread legalization of usury had an entirely positive effect on society...
Logged
Obnoxiously Slutty Girly Girl
Libertas
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,899
Finland


« Reply #2 on: May 30, 2010, 01:33:39 AM »

The mere idea of lending money and charging interest was not considered a sin. Usury then referred to the fact that a usurer would lend money and charge interest without contributing any good or service to society to justify that demand for interest.

Since the money was just being consumed, there was no possible way for a poor peasant to ever be able to repay more than what he received.

The world is different today, as money is a vehicle for investment, not just consumption. By giving up the use of his money temporarily, a lender is providing a service by which the borrower could improve himself in the long-term. The interest charged on such a loan would not be usury per the Catholic definition.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.