AK-SEN 2022: A Rank Choice (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 17, 2024, 09:10:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  AK-SEN 2022: A Rank Choice (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AK-SEN 2022: A Rank Choice  (Read 20053 times)
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,717
Ukraine


« on: June 18, 2021, 08:05:37 PM »

Dems need to make it very clear to Murkowski that if she votes for DC statehood and voting rights, they'll back her reelection, otherwise it's 3rd place for her.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,717
Ukraine


« Reply #1 on: June 20, 2021, 01:41:06 PM »

Dems need to make it very clear to Murkowski that if she votes for DC statehood and voting rights, they'll back her reelection, otherwise it's 3rd place for her.

Maybe not all of them since she does need to keep enough appeal to Republicans, but she should have to cast a deciding vote to help Schumer out in a big way to get Dem support.

She can negotiate it down to just DC statehood. That seems fair to both sides. She's already spoken out quasi-in favor of it, relating it to the struggle for statehood Alaskans went through.
Logged
7,052,770
Harry
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,717
Ukraine


« Reply #2 on: June 21, 2021, 12:29:49 PM »

Dems need to make it very clear to Murkowski that if she votes for DC statehood and voting rights, they'll back her reelection, otherwise it's 3rd place for her.

In other words, if she becomes a Democrat, the Democrats will back her re-election.

You don't need to become a Dem for supporting a few common sense policies that should be normal in a functioning democracy. That said, it would be a win-win for Dems and Murkowski. As simple as that.

DC statehood is not "common sense", nor is HR1. Both of them are unconstitutional. Their purpose is to lock in Democratic electoral and legislative majorities permanently. If any Republican votes for them, they should just switch parties and stop the charade.

The statehood bill for the Douglass Commonwealth is unquestionably constitutional and it's a lock that the Supreme Court would approve it 9-0 if they have to take the case.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 10 queries.