VOTE

[7,052,770]

Hmmm, I must attempt to fix the problem I created. . . .

Since no one has voted, we can add another proposal or two, then vote.

[7,052,770]

Eveery proposal must be here, including the one with two people in the region. If its stupid, people won't vote for it.

Or we can go back to the original idea and let people nominate for their top 5 for the poll.

VP Harry, as the president's Representative, it's your call.

There must be at least 3 people in each region for two senators and a governor.
If a plan does not follow that, it couldn't be used so it shouldn't even be considered.
Of course, one could always get someone to move to a different state, like I did with Siege40 . . .

[7,052,770]

see, whilst it is a good idea to have at least four voters per region, you can't just exclude the rest. The people have a right to choose a method with less then four people.

Did you see me acting partisanly when i set up the poll? No. So why are you hijacking it and making it a poll that only suits your ideals?

A region with 2 people could not work--we'd have a vacancy; so if a plan includes such a region, it must not be considered

[7,052,770]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well, I think that these are the only five - excluding the "joke" and the regions with too few voters. I request the VP to let the proposals as they currently are stand.

Stop calling it the 'joke'! the 'joke', the 'joke'...what is that?

Was it a serious proprosal?

[7,052,770]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

Well, I think that these are the only five - excluding the "joke" and the regions with too few voters. I request the VP to let the proposals as they currently are stand.

Stop calling it the 'joke'! the 'joke', the 'joke'...what is that?

Was it a serious proprosal?

What do you think?

I'd think not, hence the cognomen "joke"

[7,052,770]

see, whilst it is a good idea to have at least four voters per region, you can't just exclude the rest. The people have a right to choose a method with less then four people.

Did you see me acting partisanly when i set up the poll? No. So why are you hijacking it and making it a poll that only suits your ideals?

A region with 2 people could not work--we'd have a vacancy; so if a plan includes such a region, it must not be considered

Regions don't HAVE to have governors. Whilst I agree that it is stupid to have such a small region, the general populace hasn't had a chance to choose their favorite proposals yet. It was set up so that people could choose between the proposals, and take the best to a final vote, but now we are being told to choose between these five? Not only am I offended that my thread and idea, that I was running in neutrality and with good faith was hijacked, I am also offended that the people of the forum's voice isn't being heard.

If you can get someone to "move" into a small district, go ahead.
But such small regions should not be considered.

[7,052,770]

whilst it is a good idea to have at least four voters per region, you can't just exclude the rest.

I would definitely be willing to include your first proposal. But to include those with two-voter regions would be pointless, as they cannot be used. But if you insist, I shall include them.

You must be logged in to read this quote.

I can completely deny all accusations of gerrymandering for the sake of the Progressive Party, if that's what is being hinted at.

I appreciate your will to include my first proposal, but we have to include all the proposals-even Gustaf's serious alphabetical one

I also was not accusing you of gerrymandering, I actually quite like your proposal. What I was inferring was that this poll includes only states that fit into the PP's plan for regions.

My plan is no way PP or any other party.  It's just my plan.  Remember, I'm a democrat

[7,052,770]

Eveery proposal must be here, including the one with two people in the region. If its stupid, people won't vote for it.

Or we can go back to the original idea and let people nominate for their top 5 for the poll.

VP Harry, as the president's Representative, it's your call.

There must be at least 3 people in each region for two senators and a governor.
If a plan does not follow that, it couldn't be used so it shouldn't even be considered.
Of course, one could always get someone to move to a different state, like I did with Siege40 . . .

Indeed, if there is a problem of placement I am entirely willing to shift into other regions, so if need be, move me. Just ask permission first. If we've begun voting I am ready.

Siege40

No, you need to stay right where you are.  Just about every map needs Southeasterners.

[7,052,770]

yeah. new thread.

[7,052,770]

Not just Gustaf's alphabetical proposal, I presume. You will be adding *all* the proposals, right? Or at least all with three members, which the VP said was alright?

I would suppose so.
Three is the absolute minimum