Does AOC have a realistic chance to become U.S. President one day? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 11:13:27 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Does AOC have a realistic chance to become U.S. President one day? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Does AOC have a realistic chance (over 10%) of becoming U.S. President one day?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 127

Author Topic: Does AOC have a realistic chance to become U.S. President one day?  (Read 6288 times)
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


« on: April 05, 2019, 02:28:39 PM »

Yes. Thus far her conduct in drafting legislation and the questioning she's done on Congressional panels has been nothing short of Stellar. This comes as someone who is not at all sold on her. It makes people like beep boop sleeper with fear that their Patron Saint Reagan might have been wrong, and someone like her could actually relate enough to average Americans to pass a staunchly progressive platform.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 05, 2019, 08:24:56 PM »

People who support AOC shouldn’t accuse Republicans of living in a fact free world because they are supporting a politician who lives in a fact free world as well.




"Fact free". Roll Eyes

Do you make that assessment based on complete BS Fox News assessments like the green New Deal is going to prohibit procreation and cow farting? Or just a near religious like, not to mention ahistorical, belief that Reaganomics was wonderful and the only way to grow the economy is to give rich people tax breaks?
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 05, 2019, 08:55:43 PM »

People who support AOC shouldn’t accuse Republicans of living in a fact free world because they are supporting a politician who lives in a fact free world as well.





"Fact free". Roll Eyes

Do you make that assessment based on complete BS Fox News assessments like the green New Deal is going to prohibit procreation and cow farting? Or just a near religious like, not to mention ahistorical, belief that Reaganomics was wonderful and the only way to grow the economy is to give rich people tax breaks?


The cost of Trump’s Tax cuts were 1.5-2 trillion , the Bush ones were around 2.5 trillion



The cost of AOC Green New Deal are significantly higher and would cost more in one year than either the Bush or trump tax cuts did in 10 : https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/miltonezrati/2019/02/19/the-green-new-deal-and-the-cost-of-virtue/amp/


Congratulations, you found a Republican hack study from a Republican hack group that blows things way out of proportion.

Published in a republican hack magazine, don't forget.

Congratulations, beep boop. You've hit the fact free trifecta!
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 05, 2019, 09:03:37 PM »

People who support AOC shouldn’t accuse Republicans of living in a fact free world because they are supporting a politician who lives in a fact free world as well.





"Fact free". Roll Eyes

Do you make that assessment based on complete BS Fox News assessments like the green New Deal is going to prohibit procreation and cow farting? Or just a near religious like, not to mention ahistorical, belief that Reaganomics was wonderful and the only way to grow the economy is to give rich people tax breaks?


The cost of Trump’s Tax cuts were 1.5-2 trillion , the Bush ones were around 2.5 trillion



The cost of AOC Green New Deal are significantly higher and would cost more in one year than either the Bush or trump tax cuts did in 10 : https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/miltonezrati/2019/02/19/the-green-new-deal-and-the-cost-of-virtue/amp/


Congratulations, you found a Republican hack study from a Republican hack group that blows things way out of proportion.

Published in a republican hack magazine, don't forget.

Congratulations, beep boop. You've hit the fact free trifecta!

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/forbes/


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

Your first link rather proves my point, and your ladder link is a pathetic red herring attempt at whataboutism.

BTW, check out the Wikipedia page for the website you are citing. Columbia journalism review refers to it as an amateur media bias website his results are in no way scientific. Admittedly, it's somewhat difficult to be scientific about something this subjective, but you aren't exactly reaching for the stars in terms of citing credible Authority here.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


« Reply #4 on: April 08, 2019, 12:47:28 PM »

People who support AOC shouldn’t accuse Republicans of living in a fact free world because they are supporting a politician who lives in a fact free world as well.





"Fact free". Roll Eyes

Do you make that assessment based on complete BS Fox News assessments like the green New Deal is going to prohibit procreation and cow farting? Or just a near religious like, not to mention ahistorical, belief that Reaganomics was wonderful and the only way to grow the economy is to give rich people tax breaks?


The cost of Trump’s Tax cuts were 1.5-2 trillion , the Bush ones were around 2.5 trillion



The cost of AOC Green New Deal are significantly higher and would cost more in one year than either the Bush or trump tax cuts did in 10 : https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/miltonezrati/2019/02/19/the-green-new-deal-and-the-cost-of-virtue/amp/


Congratulations, you found a Republican hack study from a Republican hack group that blows things way out of proportion.

Published in a republican hack magazine, don't forget.

Congratulations, beep boop. You've hit the fact free trifecta!

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/forbes/


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

Your first link rather proves my point, and your ladder link is a pathetic red herring attempt at whataboutism.

BTW, check out the Wikipedia page for the website you are citing. Columbia journalism review refers to it as an amateur media bias website his results are in no way scientific. Admittedly, it's somewhat difficult to be scientific about something this subjective, but you aren't exactly reaching for the stars in terms of citing credible Authority here.

Find me a source which says the Green New Deal will cost under 20 trillion In 10 years




Gee, literally 5 seconds on Google and factcheck.org regarding Trump statements about it show otherwise.

You're not even trying here.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


« Reply #5 on: April 09, 2019, 11:42:48 AM »

People who support AOC shouldn’t accuse Republicans of living in a fact free world because they are supporting a politician who lives in a fact free world as well.





"Fact free". Roll Eyes

Do you make that assessment based on complete BS Fox News assessments like the green New Deal is going to prohibit procreation and cow farting? Or just a near religious like, not to mention ahistorical, belief that Reaganomics was wonderful and the only way to grow the economy is to give rich people tax breaks?


The cost of Trump’s Tax cuts were 1.5-2 trillion , the Bush ones were around 2.5 trillion



The cost of AOC Green New Deal are significantly higher and would cost more in one year than either the Bush or trump tax cuts did in 10 : https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/miltonezrati/2019/02/19/the-green-new-deal-and-the-cost-of-virtue/amp/


Congratulations, you found a Republican hack study from a Republican hack group that blows things way out of proportion.

Published in a republican hack magazine, don't forget.

Congratulations, beep boop. You've hit the fact free trifecta!

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/forbes/


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

Your first link rather proves my point, and your ladder link is a pathetic red herring attempt at whataboutism.

BTW, check out the Wikipedia page for the website you are citing. Columbia journalism review refers to it as an amateur media bias website his results are in no way scientific. Admittedly, it's somewhat difficult to be scientific about something this subjective, but you aren't exactly reaching for the stars in terms of citing credible Authority here.

Find me a source which says the Green New Deal will cost under 20 trillion In 10 years




Gee, literally 5 seconds on Google and factcheck.org regarding Trump statements about it show otherwise.

You're not even trying here.

Lol nice job deflecting and playing the whataboutism game


Do... Do you even know what those words mean? You asked if I could find any Source showing that the green New Deal would cost less than 20 trillion dollars. And I did so, literally doing everything but linking the article itself for you. That's... The exact opposite of either deflection or whataboutism.

You are really not good at this.
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


« Reply #6 on: April 09, 2019, 12:10:33 PM »


( citation needed)
Logged
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,462
United States


« Reply #7 on: July 16, 2019, 04:56:44 PM »

People who support AOC shouldn’t accuse Republicans of living in a fact free world because they are supporting a politician who lives in a fact free world as well.





"Fact free". Roll Eyes

Do you make that assessment based on complete BS Fox News assessments like the green New Deal is going to prohibit procreation and cow farting? Or just a near religious like, not to mention ahistorical, belief that Reaganomics was wonderful and the only way to grow the economy is to give rich people tax breaks?


The cost of Trump’s Tax cuts were 1.5-2 trillion , the Bush ones were around 2.5 trillion



The cost of AOC Green New Deal are significantly higher and would cost more in one year than either the Bush or trump tax cuts did in 10 : https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.forbes.com/sites/miltonezrati/2019/02/19/the-green-new-deal-and-the-cost-of-virtue/amp/


Congratulations, you found a Republican hack study from a Republican hack group that blows things way out of proportion.

Published in a republican hack magazine, don't forget.

Congratulations, beep boop. You've hit the fact free trifecta!

https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/forbes/


https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/cnn/

Your first link rather proves my point, and your ladder link is a pathetic red herring attempt at whataboutism.

BTW, check out the Wikipedia page for the website you are citing. Columbia journalism review refers to it as an amateur media bias website his results are in no way scientific. Admittedly, it's somewhat difficult to be scientific about something this subjective, but you aren't exactly reaching for the stars in terms of citing credible Authority here.

Find me a source which says the Green New Deal will cost under 20 trillion In 10 years




Gee, literally 5 seconds on Google and factcheck.org regarding Trump statements about it show otherwise.

You're not even trying here.

You want to necrobump a post of yours to prove a point? Fine, I'll necrobump my response. Which, incidentally, other than lamely trying to call deflection and whataboutism hyphen hyphen in a parent ignorance of what those words mean - - you never even tried to refute.

So, there's your facts. Being so adamant about not living in a facts free world oh, I assume this now changes your opinion?
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.048 seconds with 15 queries.