Do you wish McAuliffe had been nominated instead? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 07, 2024, 10:23:45 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Gubernatorial/State Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  Do you wish McAuliffe had been nominated instead? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Do you wish McAuliffe had been nominated instead?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 34

Author Topic: Do you wish McAuliffe had been nominated instead?  (Read 7688 times)
Badger
badger
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,501
United States


« on: November 10, 2009, 12:58:08 PM »

No. Deeds was great on the issues, he just got swept up in a Republican wave fueled by the negative opinion of the national Democrats.

1. Democrats are still more popular nationwide than Republicans.
2. President Obama has positive approval ratings in this state.
3. Deeds couldn't excite Obama's supporteres enough to get them to the polls.
4. There was no Republican wave. We lost the New York race. There was a tight battle in Maine for gay marriage. And New Jersey only went Republican because they have an awful Governor.

^^^^^^^^^^^ this. THANK you for not drinking the MSM conventional wisdom kool aid, Tmth. :-)
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 11 queries.