When did German failure become virtually certain in WW2? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2024, 03:30:51 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  When did German failure become virtually certain in WW2? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Sept 3, 1939 (France and Britain Declare War on Germany)
 
#2
June 4, 1940 (Dunkirk evacuations succeed)
 
#3
October 23, 1940 (Spain doesn’t join Axis)
 
#4
October 31, 1940 (Germany significantly cuts back bombing of UK due to losses)
 
#5
November-December 1940 (Soviet-Axis talks stall, USSR doesn’t join Axis)
 
#6
March 11, 1941 (USA approves Lend-Lease to European Allies)
 
#7
June 22, 1941 (Germany invades USSR)
 
#8
January  7th, 1942 (Barbarossa fails, Germany can’t reach Moscow)
 
#9
December 11th, 1941 (USA declares war on Germany)
 
#10
February 2, 1943 (Germany loses Battle of Stalingrad)
 
#11
July 25, 1943 (Germany diverts units to occupy Italy)
 
#12
August 23, 1943 (Germany loses Battle of Kursk)
 
#13
January 27, 1944 (Germany withdraws from Leningrad)
 
#14
June 6, 1944 (D-Day landings)
 
#15
January 25th, 1945 (Allies win Battle of Bulge)
 
#16
May 8th, 1945 (Germany finally surrenders)
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 51

Author Topic: When did German failure become virtually certain in WW2?  (Read 2418 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,296
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: August 01, 2022, 08:43:37 AM »

Probably when it invaded the USSR. I'm not gonna do the meme and say it's impossible to invade Russia, but trying to invade Russia while pursuing a grinding war with a US-armed Britain (and the increasing likelihood that the US was going to intervene eventually, was always going to be a recipe for disaster. Hitler's best bet was always going to be to wait out the UK until they broke and negotiated a separate peace. Then if he really wanted to stick it to Stalin he should probably have waited at least a few years to consolidate his hold over continental Europe and rebuild his strength. Of course even then it would have been a tall order, but at least he wouldn't have forced himself into the situation that even the Kaiserreich was desperately trying to avoid in 1914.

Thank goodness for evil's self-defeating nature.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,296
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: August 01, 2022, 02:51:26 PM »

Probably when it invaded the USSR. I'm not gonna do the meme and say it's impossible to invade Russia, but trying to invade Russia while pursuing a grinding war with a US-armed Britain (and the increasing likelihood that the US was going to intervene eventually, was always going to be a recipe for disaster. Hitler's best bet was always going to be to wait out the UK until they broke and negotiated a separate peace. Then if he really wanted to stick it to Stalin he should probably have waited at least a few years to consolidate his hold over continental Europe and rebuild his strength. Of course even then it would have been a tall order, but at least he wouldn't have forced himself into the situation that even the Kaiserreich was desperately trying to avoid in 1914.

Thank goodness for evil's self-defeating nature.

I mean invading the USSR though was the entire goal of the war to begin with , not defeating the UK . So I don’t get the what ifs behind what if the Nazis didn’t invade the USSR because in that case they would not be Nazis to begin with .

good thing I said this then
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.032 seconds with 14 queries.