The Reverse Gerrymandering Project (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 11:55:44 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  The Reverse Gerrymandering Project (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: The Reverse Gerrymandering Project  (Read 3052 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,375
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: December 08, 2020, 02:26:16 AM »

Unfortunately California isn't really a commission, it's gamed very well by dems. When 538 did this 2ish years ago the R gerrymander in the state was the same as the fair map. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/redistricting-maps/

"Proportionally partisan" =/= fair. Proportionality isn't and shouldn't be the goal of redistricting.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,375
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: December 09, 2020, 03:55:42 PM »

Unfortunately California isn't really a commission, it's gamed very well by dems. When 538 did this 2ish years ago the R gerrymander in the state was the same as the fair map. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/redistricting-maps/

"Proportionally partisan" =/= fair. Proportionality isn't and shouldn't be the goal of redistricting.

Fair seat results should be proportional, which is why I think it is almost impossible for any FPTP map to be fair.

I mean, I agree, but applications of FPP should be based on standards that are appropriate to FPP and not based on standards it by nature cannot meet.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 10 queries.