Opinion of Forced Savings/Insurance Schemes (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 28, 2024, 09:01:14 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Opinion of Forced Savings/Insurance Schemes (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: It's your choose
#1
Freedom Policies
 
#2
Horrible Policies
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 56

Author Topic: Opinion of Forced Savings/Insurance Schemes  (Read 4503 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,320
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: August 16, 2014, 10:07:06 AM »

Insurances directly provided by the State are much better.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,320
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: August 17, 2014, 06:01:55 AM »

Insurances directly provided by the State are much better.

Could you elaborate a little bit? Does something like Social Security or Canada Pension Plan, where the state forces you to pay into the plan which they administer meet your definition of "provided by the state"? Or do you mean this sort of thing should be paid out of general revenues?

I'm not familiar with the Canadian system, but I'd say that the definition is met if no for-profit entity is involved in the process. I would say a universalistic system paid for through progressive taxation is superior to one based on individual payments, but that's a comparatively minor issue.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.026 seconds with 11 queries.