US Regions - Michigan (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 16, 2024, 08:49:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  US Regions - Michigan (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: In which region do you consider Michigan would better fit ?
#1
Midwest (red region)
#2
Rust Belt (blue region)
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: US Regions - Michigan  (Read 1805 times)
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« on: August 23, 2010, 02:16:37 PM »

Here we continue with Michigan.

Here are the two regions materialized on maps, in order to avoid confusion (light shades mean hypothetical).

Midwest :



Rust Belt :



Please try to think about these options out of their context : the question isn't about the regions themselves, just about Michigan.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #1 on: August 24, 2010, 05:31:08 AM »

See, what would Cinyc's "great lakes" region result in ? A far too big region (well, NE ist still bigger but we don't have much choice there), encomprising OH, IN, MI, WI and IL.

That's still acceptable, but then what do you do with the three remaining Midwest States : MN, IA, and MO ? Three States is a bit low for a region... So, you'd probably propose to merge them with the Plains. While as you proved me this can make sense democraphically, does it make politically ? Having a New Deal Era democratic sronghold like Minnesota and the swing States or IA and MO in the same region as four of the most historically republican States (only South Dakota was, a handful of times, more dem than the average since 1932). Politically, that's a true sacrilege.

So, once again I had to make a tough choice, but I think I made the best one looking at a political perspective.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #2 on: August 24, 2010, 08:03:33 AM »

See, what would Cinyc's "great lakes" region result in ? A far too big region (well, NE ist still bigger but we don't have much choice there), encomprising OH, IN, MI, WI and IL.

That's still acceptable, but then what do you do with the three remaining Midwest States : MN, IA, and MO ? Three States is a bit low for a region... So, you'd probably propose to merge them with the Plains. While as you proved me this can make sense democraphically, does it make politically ? Having a New Deal Era democratic sronghold like Minnesota and the swing States or IA and MO in the same region as four of the most historically republican States (only South Dakota was, a handful of times, more dem than the average since 1932). Politically, that's a true sacrilege.

So, once again I had to make a tough choice, but I think I made the best one looking at a political perspective.

I think you are looking too much at the presidential results alone. The plains states still have significant ties to their traditional Dem bases, and did not flip them like the South did over the last 50 years. Much of this goes back before the New Deal to the Grange movement. The Plains states still produce long tenured Dems in Congress as well as prominent Dem Governors. What sets MN apart is the population of its urban center, which is matched only by MO on the plains, and the impact of the northern Iron Range which provides a huge tilt in favor of the Dems.

Still, you won't convince me that Minnesota and Iowa are politically similar to Plains...
Plains have some kind of congressional Blue Dog democrats such as Nelson, but there is no comparison with MN's liberal DFL congressmen. All right, South Dakota had McGovern, but it's literally the only example of left-wing democratic Senators in the Plains that comes to my mind. Instead, Minnesota had Humphrey, Mondale and now Franken (similarly to Feingold in Wisconsin).
IMO, MN and WI have a strong tradition of Roosevelt/La Follette progressivism, while Plains' ideology is more like Bryan-style populism. That's why the former are moderate dem-leaning States and th elatter are uber-GOP areas in Presidential elections.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #3 on: August 24, 2010, 09:54:19 AM »

It seems to me that you are trying to weight the political ideology of a state so highly, that it outweighs everything else.

And in the same way I think you give too much importance to demographic/sociological patterns at the expense of ideology and actual vote. It's just a question of points of view. Wink


Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

You mean something like that ?



Might be, but hard to do.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #4 on: August 25, 2010, 05:14:25 AM »

Well, of course this map is certainly more right that the 10-11 regions map we will eventually draw. However, I think this map will still have some interest anyways.
Logged
Antonio the Sixth
Antonio V
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,519
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

P P
« Reply #5 on: August 25, 2010, 05:44:28 AM »

I'd agree with cinyc on the similarity with Ohio, so Rust Belt.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.