John Roberts' Confirmation to the Supreme Court (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 05, 2024, 05:31:08 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  John Roberts' Confirmation to the Supreme Court (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: If you were a senator, would you vote to confirm him?
#1
Democrat -Yes		  
#2
Democrat -No		  
#3
Republican -Yes		  
#4
Republican -No		  
#5
independent/third party -Yes		  
#6
independent/third party -No		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 54

Author Topic: John Roberts' Confirmation to the Supreme Court  (Read 4216 times)
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00
« on: July 20, 2005, 08:16:45 AM »
Quote from: jfern on July 20, 2005, 08:16:17 AM

Anti-enviornment, anti-civil rights, very pro-corporation.

Sounds like a good man to me.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00
« Reply #1 on: July 20, 2005, 10:50:52 AM »
Why are we bringing up busing again? I thought this issue has long been dead? For my stances on busing read George Wallaces' opinion on the matter.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00
« Reply #2 on: July 20, 2005, 11:00:00 AM »
Quote from: jfern on July 20, 2005, 10:54:17 AM
Quote from: AuH2O on July 20, 2005, 10:53:28 AM
jfern said something about it. Early in his career Roberts represented Reagan's administration on the issue and thus various communist "civil rights" groups will whine a little.

Only communists care about civil rights?

Many do..much like yourself.
Logged
??????????
StatesRights
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 31,126
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: 0.00
« Reply #3 on: July 20, 2005, 11:56:53 PM »
Quote from: MacFarlan on July 20, 2005, 12:21:02 PM
Yet another reason not to vote for Roberts. He is *way* too *young* he is only 50.

Ageist.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.024 seconds with 12 queries.