Which revisionist theory is worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 03:30:57 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Which revisionist theory is worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Well?
#1
Bill Clinton was the only Democrat who could have won in 1992/Bill Clinton realigned the map
 
#2
Donald Trump was the only Republican who could have won in 2016
 
#3
They're both equally bad
 
#4
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 70

Author Topic: Which revisionist theory is worse?  (Read 3559 times)
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,298
United States


« on: January 23, 2017, 11:14:47 AM »

1992: Brown was a real quasi-libertarian weirdo back then (and kind of still is). He may have beaten Bush but he could just as easily have gone down in a landslide. Tsongas could easily have been painted as an out-of-touch liberal, as could have Harkin. Kerrey (who is actually quite charismatic) could have won a big victory though, despite his, er, issues.

2016: Kasich would have won a bigger victory on a lower turnout. I have a feeling that Rubio would have choked, losing all of the key states in the North and maybe even Florida. Cruz could have won but probably wouldn't have.

So I dunno, they're about equal.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.015 seconds with 12 queries.