Thanks, Castro. 
Also, xingkerui, this is what I mean when I say NH will vote to the left of ME this year. NH is tailor-made for Clinton. Clinton is NH personified. NH women love the Clintons, they will turn out in record setting numbers.
Just curious what you mean by this. I'd also like to hear your articulate theory on why NH is East Vermont now but wasn't in 2000.
Additionally, I don't think anyone on this site has questioned that Trump would almost certainly lose NH, it's just you posting about the state all the time - especially in threads that aren't about NH - gets super tiresome. You've also made highly debatable claims like CT and IL would flip in a national election before NH.
Could it be that Donald Trump is quite possibly the worst imaginable Republican nominee for New Hampshire? New Hampshire is the last state in New England (or for that matter to the north and east of the Potomac) to vote for a Republican nominee... but that was sixteen years ago. New Hampshire used to be the most politically-conservative state in New England, and it may still be.
Only in 2000 could New Hampshire have decided the Presidential election, and it probably won't this year. The incumbent Republican Senator seems to be losing without having a scandal blow up on her. That's a sign that the Party of that incumbent Senator is itself having problems.
