Trump blasts Sessions over GOP congressmen indictments (Sept 3rd)

[Landslide Lyndon]

I bet Flake, Collins and Corker are "concerned" by that tweet.
Heck, they might even be "troubled".

[Landslide Lyndon]

Sasse issues the dreaded Sternly Worded Statement:

You must be logged in to read this quote.

OMG, Bothsiderist pundits might cream their pants while reading this statement.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Sasse and Collins have already warned that a Sessions replacement wouldn't get confirmed.

The same pro-choice Susan Collins that's going to vote to confirm the end of abortion rights in at least half the country?

non sequitur

More like this bud.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Sasse and Collins have already warned that a Sessions replacement wouldn't get confirmed.

The same pro-choice Susan Collins that's going to vote to confirm the end of abortion rights in at least half the country?

non sequitur

More like this bud.

yes, that's a very good example of a non sequitur, good job.

If by non sequitur you mean playing dumb, then you're absolutely right.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Sasse and Collins have already warned that a Sessions replacement wouldn't get confirmed.

The same pro-choice Susan Collins that's going to vote to confirm the end of abortion rights in at least half the country?

non sequitur

Not really. When is the last time a presidential nomination was outright defeated in the Senate when the President's party holds the Senate? Trump would nominate someone that could easily appease the committee and would be confirmed on a bare majority vote She wouldn't be the deciding factor in any nominee's potential defeat.

i don't see what that has to do with the discussion though.

Of course you don't honey. Hence you are playing dumb.
Thanks for playing.

[Landslide Lyndon]

Sasse and Collins have already warned that a Sessions replacement wouldn't get confirmed.

The same pro-choice Susan Collins that's going to vote to confirm the end of abortion rights in at least half the country?

non sequitur

Not really. When is the last time a presidential nomination was outright defeated in the Senate when the President's party holds the Senate? Trump would nominate someone that could easily appease the committee and would be confirmed on a bare majority vote She wouldn't be the deciding factor in any nominee's potential defeat.

i don't see what that has to do with the discussion though.

Of course you don't honey. Hence you are playing dumb.
Thanks for playing.

Lay off the ouzo a bit.

Maybe you should lay off the kool-aid.