In case anybody cares, Giffords might run without being attacked by her opponent and still lose. It's Arizona after all.
But apparently saying that many people simply won't have the stomach to attack a woman that survived a gunshot wound in the head is a controversial/hackish statement for Phil.
And "attack" will eventually mean anything said about her so you're telling us she should simply be unopposed.
No, it isn't. You can do better than that.
As Napoleon pointed out, when a similar example was brought up (this time, mentioning a big, bad Republican!), you called him a hack and a troll.
Because the cases were completely different?
Anyway, I don't intend to stroke your ego anymore. You can have all the fun of the world with yourself and your new-found pal.
Poll
