Will we ever have open aspie president? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 01:01:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Dereich)
  Will we ever have open aspie president? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Will we ever have open aspie president?  (Read 9773 times)
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

« on: August 03, 2011, 05:43:16 PM »

Some historians have labled Washington as down right autistic.

I think the biggest problem with have an aspherger President is that it's significantly difficult to run a campaign if you're socially awkward. That's not to say it can't or has not happened, and it will in the future. But it's much more difficult for a politician to read voters if he or she is not incredibly socially strong, much less diagnosed with a mental dissability.
Logged
hcallega
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,523
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.10, S: -3.90

« Reply #1 on: August 04, 2011, 07:47:36 PM »

Asperger's isn't necessarily a disability so much as a disorder. It of course makes one a bit weaker with their social skills, but one effect is that they become much more passionate about certain things. This, of course, can be a massive boost.

I agree, for the most part. Passion is a major skill for a politician, but perhaps less so for a Presidential candidate. Candidates like Bill Bradley or Steve Forbes who are deeply interested and informed about particular issues generally get branded as "geeks" by the media and large chunks of the electorate.
This brings up a further interesting point. Last month, I attended a David Brooks lecture. He spoke briefly about the "vertical and horizental" relationships. Politicians excell at vertical relationships. They can persuade those under them to support them, and they are good at appeasing those above them. But they struggle at horizental relationships, as they generally move up quickly and spend little time at each level. So they're pretty awkward in the traditional sense, but great at moving crowds and voters.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.02 seconds with 12 queries.