The next step for some in the election mafia will be to downplay the significance of this race as McAuliffe was a "bad candidate" (which, he was) that uniquely underperformed. So... how does that explain the New Jersey results, or the other statewide races that look nearly identical (with an incumbent Dem AG likely losing)? Or the competitive HoD?
Thank you for all the thankless work you do in promoting truth. I know you continuously got called out a lot for trying to be accurate. There were accusations that you disappear when the GOP is doing bad, but it is not because you are gloating in other instances and absent (like NSV lol) when things are bad. It is because you are a critical voice needed to disrupt the incorrect groupthink in certain instances. Appreciate all your commentary.
Great call on calling this out. We went through this with Hillary Clinton, and we go through it again here. These people are raved about as "great candidates" all over the place until they lose. Robby Mook was a genius leading a blowout romp until unforeseen defeat in certain victory. Insane to see narratives rewritten overnight by the people who intensely bicker and scream loudly about how right they were and how wrong others were....until they are wrong and need this excuse the explain why they were wrong. No one ever self-evaluates.
Dems got cocky after 2020 for the narrowest of wins in an election that had no business being close. They treated it like a devastating blow and rejection of Trump because they won by half a point. Because that's what they needed to tell themselves to get their agenda across. Completely misguided.