Would you have supported Israel's creation in 1948? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 31, 2024, 06:39:29 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Would you have supported Israel's creation in 1948? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Would you have supported Israel's creation in 1948?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 65

Author Topic: Would you have supported Israel's creation in 1948?  (Read 12783 times)
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« on: June 01, 2010, 05:07:28 PM »

Yes. The Jewish people deserved their own state then and now.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #1 on: June 02, 2010, 04:20:28 PM »

BRTD comparing Israel to the SS = the second member of my ignore list.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2010, 04:56:02 PM »

Just to set the record straight:

1. There was no Palestinian state in 1948 (nor ever) so nothing was taken from anyone.
2. There was a lot of Jews in the area even before WWII, so they didn't get there because the state was created nor because of the Holocaust.

I always find it strange that the left in general is vehemently pro-immigration and considers it horribly racist to, say, argue that a large immigration of Mexicans into the US or of Arabs to Europe constitutes a threat to Western society, but yet, at the same time, thinks that Jews should not have been allowed to migrate into Israel during the 20s and 30s and that, even though this migration was legal and allowed by the authorities it was somehow deeply unethical.

Given what happened in 1937, 1948 and onwards it is pretty clear that another holocaust of Jews was the only realistic alternative to creating the state of Israel.

^^^^ Thanks for summing up what I think Smiley
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #3 on: June 11, 2010, 01:09:32 PM »

No, of course not. It's too bad the British sold out so easily to terrorists.

Jews in 1948 were terrorists?  

Obviously incidents like this were justified:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Struma_(ship)



On the real world, in 1948, Jews needed a haven where they could be safe from Pogroms and Holocausts.

Not all Jews in 1948 were terrorists. Those fighting to create Israel were: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Irgun_attacks

It's a shame how Europe has had so many pogroms and Holocausts post-1948. Obviously Israel is a far safer and more peaceful place for Jews than Europe. Roll Eyes

It really wasn't worth me taking you off ignore for about 5 minutes.
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2010, 05:44:27 AM »

The Jews had lived there long before the Arabs had, and there was a large Jewish population anyway. If you have a problem with immigration, why don't you join the Republican Party?
Logged
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,753
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2010, 05:58:17 AM »

Maybe it would have been possible to have some sort of Jewish-Arab state, if not for the Arabs attacking Israel.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.