Which of these parties would you vote for? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 02, 2024, 12:55:28 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Election What-ifs? (Moderator: Dereich)
  Which of these parties would you vote for? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Which of these parties would you vote for?
#1
United People's Revolutionary Front
 
#2
New Democratic Party
 
#3
People's Labor Party
 
#4
Christian Union
 
#5
Liberal Party of Minnesota
 
#6
Democratic Front
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 19

Author Topic: Which of these parties would you vote for?  (Read 2168 times)
Erc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 5,823
Slovenia


« on: March 13, 2005, 01:26:48 PM »

He said 70% of seats. Not 70% of votes.

Even more conducive to fraud by the majority party. I would point to a few real world examples of majority parties winning 70+% of the seats in their parliament:

http://www.electionworld.org/singapore.htm
http://www.electionworld.org/azerbaijan.htm
http://www.electionworld.org/belarus.htm- President Elected with 70+% of the vote
http://www.electionworld.org/cameroon.htm
http://www.electionworld.org/chad.htm
http://www.electionworld.org/egypt.htm

That is just a small sampling. Most of them do not have Freedom House ratings, in either poltical rights or civil rights, less than four.

True enough but if (say) the North East region of England were to break away, based on who holds the Westminster seats at the moment, something like 90% would be held by one party.

Well, parties do tend to (in the long run) adjust themselves to the countries they're in (on the national level).  If you imposed the US Party system on the UK, the Democrats would always win...to a point where either the Republicans would move left or the Democratic party would fracture.

You can even see this on the local level, on occasion...Phil Bredesen (D-TN) is probably more conservative than Arnold Schwarzenegger (R-CA).

So, if the Northeast were to split off, Labour would have the immediate advantage...but I doubt Labour could actually keep itself intact for that long without external threats.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.