Should Omar Mateen have been legally allowed to buy a gun on June 10, 2016? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 11, 2024, 04:18:08 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Should Omar Mateen have been legally allowed to buy a gun on June 10, 2016? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Should Omar Mateen have been legally allowed to buy a gun on June 10, 2016?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 80

Author Topic: Should Omar Mateen have been legally allowed to buy a gun on June 10, 2016?  (Read 2434 times)
MK
Mike Keller
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,432
United States


« on: June 12, 2016, 11:11:04 PM »
« edited: June 12, 2016, 11:18:01 PM by MK »

No one needs an AR-15 in a domestic capacity, let alone an angry homophobic ISIS supporter.

Think about it.



Now this weapon was used at

1. Sandy Hook
2. San Bernadino
3. Colorado theatre - Batman movie
4. Oregon Community College
5. Santa Monica massacre

http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/orlando-nightclub-massacre/ar-15-rifle-used-orlando-massacre-has-bloody-pedigree-n590581

It is only designed to kill human beings.

I am a little pissed that he was permitted to buy such a weapon.

Just to imagine the families grief makes me furious about this issue.


 All guns are designed to kill things.   The absurdity in this thread is really telling. 

"No one should be allowed to buy that gun.  It's for assault not defense"      Really people?
Logged
MK
Mike Keller
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,432
United States


« Reply #1 on: June 13, 2016, 01:00:03 AM »

At some point, the 2nd Amendment Absolutists need to acknowledge that there is a tradeoff between freedom and security.
They need to admit that you can't make it harder for people like Omar Mateen to get assault weapons without making it harder for everyone to get them. And if you aren't willing to make it harder for everyone to get them, you're leaving an opening for terror attacks like this to happen.

Stricter immigration laws would not have stopped this non-immigrant.

I'm not sure how "mental health" does anything unless you subject everyone to mandatory psychiatric evaluations at regular intervals.

You can't just say, "Well we'll just take the guns away from the Muslims so that the LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS can have all the arms they want."

There is always a trade off in a free society.  Its great that the 2nd amendment keeps it that way.

While you pointed out that this guy was an "american born", I do feel that we haven't confronted extremist Islamic ideology strong enough.  
Logged
MK
Mike Keller
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,432
United States


« Reply #2 on: June 13, 2016, 01:48:26 AM »

After all those FBI interviews with this guy why wasn't an identifier on his SBI number?   One other thing I'm curious about is when did he start this security job?   If anything the employer should have revoked his permit to work armed security.    Seems like some break downs here.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 12 queries.