AZ-GOV (Target Smart/Research AZ): Hobbs +9, +5 (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 10:50:33 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2022 Gubernatorial Election Polls
  AZ-GOV (Target Smart/Research AZ): Hobbs +9, +5 (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AZ-GOV (Target Smart/Research AZ): Hobbs +9, +5  (Read 1117 times)
GeorgiaModerate
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 33,120


« on: July 15, 2022, 09:11:21 AM »

Not happening. This race is Likely R, Hobbs will run behind Kelly (who's already an underdog.)

I mean this in the nicest way possible, and you are certainly not the only offender in this regard, but why even engage with these polls if your electoral predictions are more religious than scientific? This poll could say anything from Lake+10 to Hobbs+50 and I doubt it'd change your outlook much. That's fine, I'm not going to try to talk you out of it, but why engage with the polling if it's meaningless to you?

Give me one good reason I should believe this poll. Four cycles in a row they've underestimated the GOP.

Arizona polling averages have not been too bad. They nailed the 2020 president average and also got Kelly's vote share nearly correct that year too.

Meanwhile Sinema outdid the polling in 2018, so you're wrong in what you're saying anyway.

You must understand that by all appearances, SnowLabrador thinks every poll is bad for Democrats: if it shows the Republican up, it means the Democrat is in trouble; if it shows the Democrat up, it means the poll is flawed (or polls in general are flawed). 

I don't know why he bothers to follow polls either.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.022 seconds with 12 queries.