Brazil to propose embryo of Brics currency at summit (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 02:59:09 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Brazil to propose embryo of Brics currency at summit (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Brazil to propose embryo of Brics currency at summit  (Read 2662 times)
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« on: August 21, 2023, 06:57:03 AM »
« edited: August 21, 2023, 09:01:05 AM by Red Velvet »

Brazil to propose embryo of Brics currency at summit

The summit that will take place in South Africa this week between the leaders of Brazil, China, Russia, South Africa and India (Brics) will try to close an agreement to accelerate the process of transformation of the international scenario and consolidate the alliance as an unavoidable player in the diplomacy and geopolitics.

In his participation, President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva will bring up the idea of initiating studies to establish a reference unit among the five currencies of the bloc. The goal is that, once the work is done, the alliance can later establish whether there is space to create a currency that will allow trade to be carried out without going through the dollar.

The first step towards this, however, would be the establishment of a kind of value reference unit. The Brazilian project already has the explicit support of Russians and is seen with sympathy by China.

As Brazil assumes the presidency of the BRICS in 2025, one of the possibilities is that the studies would be finished by then and that, then, it would be up to the Brazilian government to announce the results of this initiative.

The Brazilian government, however, rejects the idea that it will open a front of opposition to the dollar. It is, according to Brasília, just thinking about new alternatives for the world.

In the wake of the transformations that the Brics want to promote, this is a strategic chapter for trade between the five economies to take place preferably in local currencies.

In the future, this would reduce the use of the dollar and dependence on the US currency. As diplomats point out, this is not a financial issue. But a geopolitical position of enormous proportions.

For the American government, the reduction of the dollar's role does not only mean a loss of hegemony. Part of the unilateral sanctions applied by the US is on the financial system, given the dominant presence of the dollar. A country, therefore, can be asphyxiated only by being prevented from using US currency.

But if a shadow financial system is created with alternative currencies, the White House's power to impose sanctions is radically reduced.

In a seminar promoted this weekend by the South Africans, the Brazilian Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr. highlighted how this is used.

"There has been an instrumentalization of the dollar as a weapon. That is, the use of the national / international currency and the Western financial system to target hostile countries or countries seen as such," he said.

"Venezuela, Iran, Afghanistan and, to a large extent, Russia were targets of sanctions and punitive measures that could only be applied because the dollar and the US financial system occupy the position they occupy in the world", said the economist.

According to him, the case of Russia is "unprecedented". "After the invasion of Ukraine, the US and its European allies put a freeze on Russian reserves invested in dollars and euros, worth around $300 billion, roughly half of Russia's net international assets," he said.

"Evidently, the use and abuse of the dollar's privileged position leads to a loss of legitimacy of the prevailing international monetary system. This has caused an erosion of confidence in the dollar - and confidence is an indispensable requirement for any currency. In a sentence: the The United States is today the main enemy of the dollar as a world currency", he warned.

For him, a propitious environment for discussions on the reform of the monetary system and the de-dollarization of international transactions was "created by the US itself".

Currency name: R5

The Brazilian even designed what could be the path to a bloc currency. According to him, "the matter is complex, at the same time financial and political".

But at least one candidate for the coin's name already exists. Aleksei Mozhin, Russian executive director of the IMF, noted that the currencies of the five countries all start with the letter "R" - real, ruble, rupee, renminbi and rand. His suggestion, therefore, is that the possible new currency be called R5.

According to Nogueira Batista, the R5 would start as a unit of account, taking the form of a basket of five currencies. "The weights of the five currencies would roughly reflect the relative weights of the five economies," he said.

The renminbi would carry the most weight in the basket, followed by the rupee, then the real and the ruble, with the rand having a lower weight.

"The Chinese currency could, to give an illustrative example, represent 40% of the basket; the Indian currency, 25%; the Russian and Brazilian currencies, 15% each; and South Africa, 5%", he explained.

In a first step, the R5 could be used as a unit of denomination for certain transactions and official accounting records, in addition to being adopted to replace the dollar in the internal accounting of the financial mechanisms created by the bloc.

Both the Brazilian government and the economist point out that none of this means that the R5 has a physical existence or that a BRICS Central Bank is created. "The objective would not be to create a single currency that would replace the five national currencies", clarified the economist.

In retreat, BRICS leaders try to redefine the world's geopolitical map

But the currency is not the only issue on the agenda. If the hegemony in the last 200 years has been on the axis between Europe and the USA, the bloc will make it clear even during the summit and in its final declaration that the system is outdated, that reforms are urgent and that there will be no more room for international decisions without the presence of the Brics.

In addition to the currency issue, two other topics will be on the meeting's agenda.

- The expansion of the BRICS
- A common position on the reform of international bodies

Together, these points mean a shift in the tectonic plates in international politics as rarely seen in decades and the realization that a new relationship of strength has come to exist between the emerging countries and the Western powers.

But, for now, there is no consensus on how each of the points will be dealt with and, in a retreat restricted to the leaders, the hope is that an agreement will be reached.

The retreat is organized to take place on Tuesday night (22nd), in Johannesburg. Only leaders will be allowed to enter, accompanied by their respective chancellors and an extremely limited number of assistants.

Vladimir Putin, the Russian leader, will not travel to South Africa, facing the risk of being arrested on account of an indictment by the International Criminal Court. But, in the retreat and in the debates, he will participate by videoconference, while his chancellor, Sergey Lavrov, will be at the meeting in person.

Tension

Sources among the Brics negotiators reveal that China's idea was that there would be no negotiation during the summit. Xi Jinping, Chinese president, is known for his "imperial" presence at events and always wants decisions to have already been taken before his participation.

But both Brazil and South Africans, with former unionist leaders, are comfortable being in retreat to negotiate a political settlement. Among foreign diplomats, there is a fear that Lula and Ramaphosa will end up winning.

Expansion and confrontation with Chinese

But another heated debate promises to be the expansion of the bloc. Over the past few months, negotiators have worked out different scenarios for what an expansion of the alliance could look like. The idea was spearheaded by China, in an effort to expand its influence and, in the view of certain groups within the Brazilian government, an offensive to instrumentalize the Brics.

With the bloc full of its allies, China could expand its power in the international debate, in decisions in international organizations and even in setting the agenda for debates at the UN.

For Brazil, this is a scenario that does not necessarily serve its interests. The fear in the Itamaraty is of a loss of national leadership among the emerging countries and the risk that the bloc becomes hostage to Beijing's strategic goals.

For this reason, in recent months, Itamaraty has insisted on defending the establishment of criteria that should be used for the entry of new members, as well as a regional balance. The objective was to allow Brazil's South American allies to take part, counterbalancing the arrival of Chinese allies.

What are the possible scenarios:

- New members of the Brics must first be members of the NDB, the bank of the Brics
- Bloc should favor the entry of members who are already part of the G20

On the table, there is the possibility that expansion will take place to include three to five new members. But that is only if there is consensus and criteria. In total, 22 countries have expressed interest in joining the alliance.

Risk of weakening Brazil's candidacy on the Security Council

But Chinese influence is not Brazil's only concern. One of the fears is that, with a greater number of members, the historic candidacy of Brazilians, Indians and South Africans for permanent seats on the UN Security Council will be weakened by internal competition between emerging countries.

Today, China is seen by Brazil as a government that does not want the expansion of the Security Council and that, behind the scenes, works against this idea. With the emerging bloc doubling in size and with Chinese allies, however, the doubt is whether the Brazilian candidacy would not end up being affected.

Another fear is that, without criteria, governments that organize future summits invite disputed regions to the table. For 2024, the presidency of the bloc will be Russia and nothing prevents Putin, to demonstrate his power, from inviting the leaders of Donetsk to the event.

Whatever the decision, it will redefine the borders between the powers and, on the part of the emerging powers, make it clear that the existence of a new bloc will challenge the supremacy established by Europe and the USA since the 18th century.

https://noticias.uol.com.br/colunas/jamil-chade/2023/08/21/brasil-vai-propor-embriao-de-moeda-dos-brics-em-cupula.htm
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #1 on: August 23, 2023, 11:13:26 AM »

Brazilian economist Paulo Nogueira Batista Jr. presents his currency proposal in a speech at South Africa during the XV BRICS summit:

Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #2 on: August 23, 2023, 11:21:08 AM »







Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #3 on: August 23, 2023, 05:01:38 PM »

I’m hearing the group has reached an agreement for which countries will be included in the expansion.

A lot of discussion in this year edition was about the group expansion since 22 or 23 new countries applied for membership in 2022 or 2023 because of the Western crazy reaction to the Ukraine War.

Though all countries support expansion so that the group can have more validation as the largest voice for the Global South in this era like there has never been before, there was tons of debate about who should be included - with China supporting including everyone while Brazil for example supports a more limited expansion with defined criteria about who gets in.

New BRICS members will be:

- Saudi Arabia
- Iran
- UAE
- Argentina
- Egypt

We were always missing an Arab world representative, so expected that we would get more than one. Still, it’s a whole ton of them, which is good for Muslim representation.

Because of geographical balance, they’re in agreement to include a new African country soon in the future. Personally, I think Nigeria would make the most sense considering its size and potential.

Indonesia was considered a given by everyone but Indonesians said recently they weren’t in political conditions for inclusion in this moment. Jakarta could still be included in the future though.

I would be fine with a group of 12 members for the next 20 years tbh, to see how it works. The Original 5 + The New 5 + Indonesia and Nigeria (or other African country) added in-between.

Bangladesh is a question mark to me. I have no idea if it will enter tomorrow or if it’s considered for the future.

I really like the additions, though it leaves open room for future big inclusions, like Indonesia and Nigeria - which I think are necessary to have. Mexico would be cool too but extremely unlikely, though they manifested interest.

European countries should have no room IMO, exception maybe being Turkey. Which is why I like that Greece application to join didn’t go forward, if you’re an EU country there’s no way you can call yourself a part of the Global South.

About the additions themselves, why I favor them:

Egypt: Strategic geographical position, controlling the Suez Canal - which is extremely important for Europe’s supply through Asia. Egypt is also economically the 3rd most important country in Africa (behind South Africa and Nigeria), besides having a relevant military force.

Saudi Arabia and Iran: These two go together for me. I think it’s wonderful that a platform like BRICS can stimulate dialogue and a relationship between these two after US has attempted to pit one against the other for so damn long only for the sake of their self-interests. Very symbolic for both to join together. Alas, they’re both also extremely strategic for being two of the largest oil powerhouses in the world, having deep impact in its prices throughout the globe.

UAE: Benefits from already being part of the BRICS bank (one of the criteria used) and even if small in area, it’s economically bigger than South Africa, an OG member. Also one of the top 10 oil producers in the world, being an OPEC member.

Argentina: For the moment, probably weakest inclusion considering Milei’s future election, they’re bound to be an inactive member and dumb western stooges just as they join. Still, I think Brazil was totally correct to campaign for them for different reasonings:

A) As you welcome a bunch of non-democratic nations into board, it’s important to have some counterbalance in order to maintain the group’s original balance. Important for Brazil to also have a Latin American counterpart in an expanded grouping.

B) Despite their current crisis, Argentina is a major commodity exporter and still in the top 25 global economies, ahead of South Africa, UAE, Egypt. Also a G20 country, which is one of the criteria established.

C) Forces Milei to have pragmatic diplomatic relationship with China and Brazil like he despises lmaaaaaao. And if he’s so stupid to try to go out of a major geopolitical active, we can just invite someone else in their place - probably Nigeria - to keep it at 10.
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #4 on: August 24, 2023, 03:02:48 AM »
« Edited: August 24, 2023, 03:39:01 AM by Red Velvet »

I didn’t say better, I said forces to have diplomatic relations lol. Because the guy is an isolationist crazy apple a la Bolsonaro, who attacked China for “communism” and Brazil for having a leftist president, but despite its supposedly “pro-western” nature in theory, has also called Joe Biden a socialist lmaaaao

So I put Milei in the same “Pro-Western” camp as Bolsonaro for now, initially pro-western but bound to have conflicts if he perceives US and Europe leaders as too woke and socialist for his extremist standards. Bolsonaro was really “Anti-China” rethorically only in his first two years, which changed after he lost Trump.

Probably a Trump 2024 election would bring validation to Milei positions, as the “West” these people identify with is the ~White conservative~ side. One thing is political rhetoric though, another one is pragmatism.

I’m not sure Argentina is locked though, it’s insiders talk in the media I’m hearing. It’s mainly Lula/Brazil using their weight pushing for them if they get in though, as they don’t seem that interested now post-election. There might be surprise inclusions or exclusions in the announcement.

I think Saudi Arabia is the most likely out of all. Then there are other 6 or 7 other countries that are viable candidates but there are mixed reports about their entrance or not. Besides the ones I mentioned, Indonesia and Bangladesh might be possibilities but idk if they’re really in or who would be out in their place, because I doubt more than 5 are announced.

Brazilian media was throwing these five names though, with Indonesia being a strong candidate that asked for more time but I’m not sure that’s confirmed. Different sources said different stuff and that Indonesia is actually in. Who knows the truth? idk

Iran apparently wasn’t in, because Saudi Arabia was getting in instead, but the Iranian campaign to join was reportedly really strong. It weights that is has good relationship with all the original 5 as well. We’ll see, I think it would be cool if they both get in. But if it’s just one, it will be the Saudis.
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #5 on: August 24, 2023, 03:38:32 AM »

I’m just now hearing Ethiopia as a real contender for the open African spot that I mentioned.

To sum up, the announcement may be any combination of the following 8:

- Saudi Arabia
- UAE
- Argentina
- Iran
- Egypt
- Indonesia
- Bangladesh
- Ethiopia

But not all of these are getting in, something between 3 minimum and 6 maximum me thinks.
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #6 on: August 24, 2023, 03:47:58 AM »


Brazilian presidency tweet has a quote of Lula welcoming Saudi Arabia, Argentina, Egypt, UAE, Ethiopia and Iran to the group.

So the 5 countries I already anticipated yesterday + Ethiopia filling the African spot that was supposed to be filled-in later.

The reports about Indonesia asking to join at a later date were true, I guess. And I’m not sure what happened to Bangladesh (which I interpreted as an India push like Argentina was a Brazil push).

Other candidatures between the 23 made since last year didn’t get track. Like, sorry but obviously places like Nicaragua weren’t getting in lol
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #7 on: August 24, 2023, 04:13:14 AM »
« Edited: August 24, 2023, 04:23:34 AM by Red Velvet »

Ethiopia will be the country with least power in the group, but I like their inclusion. It was very important to have a big Subsaharan African representative.

It’s the 5th largest economy in Africa, behind Nigeria; South Africa; Egypt; Algeria.

Nigeria would be great but it didn’t make a formal application; South Africa and Egypt are already in; Algeria is more of MENA African like Egypt is than SSA like it was really important to have included during this edition.

So Ethiopia was 2nd best option after Nigeria. These are the top 10 economically biggest countries in Africa:

1. Nigeria (no formal application)
2. South Africa (original member)
3. Egypt (MENA)
4. Algeria (MENA)
5. Ethiopia
6. Morocco (MENA)
7. Kenya
8. Angola
9. Tanzania
10. Ivory Coast

But enough with the inclusions for now. We should totally include Indonesia, Nigeria separately in the near future depending on their will. Places like Mexico, Thailand, Vietnam as well but it depends a lot on geopolitical willingness to.

A larger expansion like the one that happened this year only in 20 years depending on how this one goes.
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #8 on: August 24, 2023, 04:29:36 AM »

The summit has approved Brazil’s proposal for studies to be conducted on a new shared currency for intra-payments too!

Important to notice this is all very early stages though. Brazil’s hopes are for the studies to be made until 2025 (when it will hold Brics presidency) and if proven successful, the currency would be agreed with and announced during the 2025 summit in Brazil.

A common misconception is thinking that the currency would be a new Euro or something that would substitute national currencies when it would be designed for trade only, for all BRICS countries.
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #9 on: August 24, 2023, 04:57:33 AM »

Lula says BRICS differences and diversity are a reason for its strength, not a weakness like westerners want to assume.



Quote
Good morning. The last time I attended a BRICS meeting was in 2010. I am deeply impressed with the maturity of the BRICS and the results we have managed to achieve together.



Quote
Many claimed that the BRICS would be too different to forge a common vision. Experience, however, demonstrates the opposite. Our diversity strengthens the fight for a new order that accommodates the economic, geographic and political plurality of the 21st century.



Quote
The presence, at this Brics meeting, of dozens of leaders from other countries in the Global South shows that the world is more complex than the Cold War mentality that some want to restore. Instead of adhering to the logic of competition, which imposes automatic alignments and fosters distrust, we must strengthen our collaboration. #BRICS2023
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #10 on: September 07, 2023, 09:16:11 AM »

First draft of the BRICS currency, presented by the Russian embassy in South Africa to the UAE:


I quite like it, especially the concept of there not being a “correct side” to look at it, ensuring no country can be at the top. You can see the currency value from all 4 corners of the paper.

Noticeable how each country flag is a “brick” too.

The only thing I think it’s weird is the giant Taj Mahal floating over the Indian flag. Aesthetically, it stands out from others and it’s weird. I would put it in front of the flag like you can see with Brazil, Russia, China “symbols”. Or at least make it somewhat smaller.

The Christ The Redeemer design also needs to change in order to be more faithful to the real thing. The face of this one is low-key ugly.

In the back of the currency they would put the new countries that joined. Since this is only an idea draft, they put a bunch of random countries that aren’t members in the back as well lmao. I think this was made before the recent expansion so they just included a random set of countries that had applied but had not joined yet.

That would obviously have to change so that only BRICS members are represented in the currency, but I like the concept of updating the design to include the new membership on the back too, like they were “bricks” as well.

Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #11 on: September 09, 2023, 04:44:30 AM »


You quite like it, huh? Which part do you like the most- the country currently brutally invading its neighbor, murdering innocents and raping little girls? Or maybe the country currently geocoding an ethnic minority and using force to put formerly democratic societies under oppressive authoritarianism? Oh, oh, how about the country in the tweet OP, soon to join them, that kills women for being immodest and executes gay people for existing? Do you like seeing your country’s flag next to theirs?

Like what? It’s just an early draft idea, the thing doesn’t even exist yet and you’re already getting this pressed and desperate lol

BRICS countries getting closer is simply a geopolitical fact resulted from the western reaction to the Ukraine War, just like people celebrated NATO getting stronger because what, Sweden now joined? If you treat the world as something divided in blocs, naturally you will see this exact same fragmentation come to life.

As I said in previous posts, the united currency project is still being technically studied by the countries for at least the next two years. And the project is more focused on a basket of currencies for trade between the countries than a paper currency that would replace national currencies (no one wants that).

Still, this design was made symbolically and as an early idea, I think it looks pretty cool though some adjustments would have to be made if it was something to actually be implemented IMO

Mostly regarding the “symbols” details of each country. Brazil; Russia and India are construction monuments while China is just a “Dragon”?Huh Make Taj Mahal smaller too and in front of the Indian flag too. Give the Brazilian Christ a more elegant face.

However, the concept of putting all five founding countries in a circle while the currency value can be seen from all four sides is pretty wicked, I love it yeah. I don’t think I’ve ever seen a paper currency with this kind of concept that evidences cooperation and no hierarchy between the members represented.
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #12 on: September 10, 2023, 07:06:55 PM »
« Edited: September 10, 2023, 07:11:35 PM by Red Velvet »

Ok mr fascist mods who deleted the "stop fetishizing the global south" thread? I was proud of my joke in that!

Yeah, I also liked my post there Sad

So I will just post this related Robin Brooks tweet here:


Brazil surpluses come from exports to China and Latin America and other 3rd world nations.

Imports from Russia are fertilizers, necessary products for the exportation business.
Logged
Red Velvet
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,195
Brazil


« Reply #13 on: September 16, 2023, 08:53:50 AM »

I still don’t understand what “BRICS” is supposed to mean. I do know what the acronym refers to, but that isn’t an explanation.

Reference of “BRICS” is to literally bricks, which together can build a wall.

When you think of a wall, you think of something that’s constructed to protect residents of a house, blocking external threats like wind, rain, etc.

That’s exactly the purpose of BRICS. The biggest emergent countries together can have a major leverage over developed countries and use this to their collective self-protection.

Russia for example, in the midst of Western sanctions, can rely on turning to BRICS in order to safeguard them from these attacks. It’s exactly what a house, built by walls and brics, is supposed to do.

A bric by itself is nothing, but together we can construct something much bigger and stronger. That’s the symbolism behind and why with more “brics” the stronger the house structure gets.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.047 seconds with 12 queries.