2024 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2024, 02:33:10 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Congressional Elections (Moderators: Brittain33, GeorgiaModerate, Gass3268, Virginiá, Gracile)
  2024 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: 2024 Generic Ballot / Recruitment / Fundraising / Ratings Megathread  (Read 45765 times)
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,901


« on: March 11, 2023, 01:38:00 PM »



On what planet are Yadira Caraveo and Gabe Vasquez in toss-up races? Biden won both districts and Vasquez ousted an incumbent in a Ronchetti district.

Since after WA-03 and MI-07 (I’d say that starts at Tilt D), there aren’t many options to choose from for blue seats to put into the tossup category. They probably wanted to throw a couple on so as not to be accused of bias.

Most will just go for the PA seats.

I guess there’s an argument, but even with Mastriano and Oz bearing the ticket down, it was still in a midterm with 8% inflation and Biden at 40% approval. Cartwright and Wild had no business holding on, but did anyway. I think they start at Lean D.

In a lot of states 2024 won't be as good of an environment for Democrats as 2022. The level of persuasion achieved is just not possible in a presidential year, especially with Biden still being relatively unpopular. Biden would be winning the PV by 10 with that level of persuasion and that seems pretty unlikely. On the national level it will be a better year for Dems, but Shapiro and Whitmer powered blue waves in their states and in 2024 it will now be Biden's performance instructing the down ballot races.

Cartwright is in a Trump seat and Wild is in a Biden +1 seat. Those are about as tossup-y as it gets. Cartwright's been losing his crossover appeal, doing worse than 2020 despite a better or equal environment in PA is not a great sign for him. If PA is D +1 in the Presidential race again, he would likely lose. Wild is in a better position because her seat is bluer, but Shapiro and Fetterman both won her seat by a lot more than she did. She should beat Scheller in any case, the GOP should find someone else.

The same thing is true in Michigan. The environment in Michigan was extremely good for Democrats and it's not going to be replicated in 2022. This probably doesn't mean any seats flipped, because Kildee is strong and the Lansing seat is trending away from them, but James is in a better position than 2022. Biden won't be winning the seat by double digits like Whitmer did.
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,901


« Reply #1 on: March 22, 2024, 09:55:24 AM »

CA-09 and CA-49 being Lean D at this point is kind of absurd



CA-09 had more GOP votes in the primary and the GOP actually has a good candidate. Mayor of the largest city in the district. Lean D seems appropriate, although Likely still makes sense.

CA-49 I'd keep as Likely, but Levin didn't dominate the primary. GOP doesn't have the candidate to flip it though.
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,901


« Reply #2 on: March 22, 2024, 11:06:16 AM »

CA-09 and CA-49 being Lean D at this point is kind of absurd



CA-09 had more GOP votes in the primary and the GOP actually has a good candidate. Mayor of the largest city in the district. Lean D seems appropriate, although Likely still makes sense.

CA-49 I'd keep as Likely, but Levin didn't dominate the primary. GOP doesn't have the candidate to flip it though.

Last time I remember Harder was doing fine in the primary.

Late returns pushed him from 52 to under 50.
Logged
kwabbit
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,901


« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2024, 11:28:24 AM »

CA-09 and CA-49 being Lean D at this point is kind of absurd



CA-09 had more GOP votes in the primary and the GOP actually has a good candidate. Mayor of the largest city in the district. Lean D seems appropriate, although Likely still makes sense.

CA-49 I'd keep as Likely, but Levin didn't dominate the primary. GOP doesn't have the candidate to flip it though.

Last time I remember Harder was doing fine in the primary.

Late returns pushed him from 52 to under 50.

Come to think of it, Harder was barely above 50 in the 2022 primary and he easily won in November. I don’t think he has much to worry about and Kevin Lincoln is Allan Fung 2.0 at best.

Yeah, that's the best point in favor of Harder being fine. However, he was a carpetbagger in the 2022 primary and now has actually repped it, so reason to believe the primary is more correlated with the general now.

I don't think Lincoln is as strong as Fung, but the districts are extremely different. If the district wasn't below 20% college educated and heavily Hispanic, it wouldn't really be a question.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 10 queries.