I honestly don't care about the typical legalese argument. I do think democracy is being eroded from within liberal democratic institutions by judges and prosecutors (whether left or right) and I can list the issues with the Spanish judiciary once I get to my PC. But your r/iamverysmart and understand liberal democracy act isn't impressive. If you can't see how the Spanish legal system is fundamentally biased that's your problem.
The difference here is that Sanchez is not doing what Netenyahu is doing. Sanchez is not Orbanising Spain, as far as I can tell he is not amending the constitution either. Maybe you should join in the Cara al Sol chants on the street if you think this is anywhere near the kind of judiciary to legislative power grap you think it is. I'm sure you'll meet plenty of defenders of liberal democracy there.
It may not be unwarranted in Spanish law, but when Ayuso awards contracts to her brother for significant amounts but is a free woman while political leaders of a minority community are jailed for organising the activity of putting papers in boxes as part of the manifesto they were elected on, I think you have a sick judiciary yes.
Well, with that first sentence you yourself confirm that you are proudly ignorant of what you are talking about. Whatever fits you to prevent cognitive dissonance from interfering with your prejudices and the two or three sectarian notions you have about the issue. There is nothing of substance to be discussed with you.
