Chips
Those Chips
Junior Chimp
![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif) ![*](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/star.gif)
Posts: 5,209
![](./avatars/Libertarian/L_OH.gif)
|
![](https://talkelections.org/FORUM/IMG/post/xx.gif) |
« on: May 09, 2022, 10:30:03 PM » |
|
Option 1: Pro-life and pro-mandate. I think this set of views will be the least represented, but is one of the more morally sound ones. You're pro life and you apply the same principles to vaccinations and masks, citing that they can do wonders for not just you but a whole community.
Option 2: Pro-life and anti-mandate. The standard Republican position. You're pro-life and anti-mandate, probably citing economic and/or freedom reasons. This can be implied as a more hypocritical stance, but regardless if you're a Republican there's an 80-90% likelihood you take this stance.
Option 3: Pro-choice and pro-mandate. This is the stance that can be inferred as the most hypocritical. Maybe you justify this stance by saying something along the lines of abortions aren't contagious and COVID is and because COVID can wreck entire communities, it's more important to put the community's safety above your personal choice in that instance where as abortions don't affect anyone but the person getting the abortion.
Option 4: Pro-choice and anti-mandate. Your stance is short, sweet and straight to the point. Women have the right to seek abortion just as everyone has the right to not seek vaccinations.
|