Opinion of employer firing employee for participating in Trump DC protest without violating the law (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 18, 2024, 04:50:07 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Opinion of employer firing employee for participating in Trump DC protest without violating the law (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Opinion of employer firing an employee for participating in Trump DC protest without violating the law
#1
D Horrible action
 
#2
D Freedom action
 
#3
R Horrible action
 
#4
R Freedom action
 
#5
D Other
 
#6
R Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 84

Author Topic: Opinion of employer firing employee for participating in Trump DC protest without violating the law  (Read 2300 times)
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,784


« on: January 28, 2021, 11:52:12 AM »

49 states are at-will employment states. Legally they can be fired for any reason that isn’t a protected class violation.

Typically this is not something that people in the ostensibly pro-worker party celebrate.

One, I’m describing reality not taking a stance. Two, “pro-worker” sometimes means making sure an employee isn’t making his co-workers uncomfortable.

This is not for the employer to decide.

That said...

It's just the mask being pulled back. The left hasn't been "pro-worker" for quite a while.

If by the left you mean the Democratic Party, it is the less anti-worker of the two parties and its current political movements are hardly "going mask off." In recent history, it probably moved the most against workers under the Clinton administration.
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,784


« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2021, 01:11:31 PM »

Anyone who participated in this should be in prison. Failing that, unemployed and destitute is an acceptable compromise.

Sad to see all the little authoritarians in this thread who want the government to force private employers to employee seditionists and traitors.

It's authoritarian to suggest employers should decide who seditionists and traitors are (amongst their employees). They will misuse that power and it is even less accountable than the government's.
Logged
TiltsAreUnderrated
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,784


« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2021, 09:27:14 PM »

If their job requires them to operate autonomously from authority and engage in critical thinking, going to a "stop the steal" protest would seem to be strong indicators against those skills in both regards.

Also
If the employee's actions being there (regardless of "where exactly" the employee was) is causing a huge distraction (problems) to running of the business, then the employee should be let-go.

If you look at the percentages of people who believe in moronic conspiracy theories about the moon landing, the Holocaust and so on, you’ll find this principle unsustainable. There are a lot of people who are capable of doing decent jobs while failing to engage their brains in politics - in fact, the vast majority of people do this, albeit to a lesser extent than Qanoners in most cases.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 12 queries.