See, now you are making stuff up. My concern was that kids of a certain predisposition, whether it be genetically caused or otherwise, were being pushed into treatments that science shows sterilizes them. That sounds like eugenics to me i.e. selectively breeding a group out of existence. "Normal" or "saved" or otherwise I was upset that a group is being removed from the gene pool, not that "oh no now they cant be normal".
1. Why are you framing it as if those sorts of risks are being hidden from trans people?
2. It's only eugenics if they're being forced to take these drugs against their will. You wouldn't call it eugenics if a cis man willingly got a vasectomy or a cis woman willingly got her tubes tied.
This is a stupid, bad-faith argument.
Ethical doctors are not giving vasectomies to young men in their teens, let alone anyone in their early adolescence, lol.