Which of these Western-state dummymanders is worse? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 01, 2024, 01:42:42 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Which of these Western-state dummymanders is worse? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: ?
#1
Oregon
 
#2
Nevada
 
#3
(Bonus option) New Mexico
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 35

Author Topic: Which of these Western-state dummymanders is worse?  (Read 926 times)
ProgressiveModerate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,982


« on: October 16, 2022, 08:07:42 PM »

At face value, Oregon's gerrymander is pretty solid, it just seems like Dems may be having a terrible year in Oregon. A Biden + 14 left-shifting seat in any remotely normal circumstances would not be competitive and even a 4D-2R delegation in an R leaning year is fine.

New Mexico's gerrymander is hard because no matter what the best you could do would be to perfectly balance all 3 seats in terms of partisanship which may violate VRA.

Nevada Dems really took a gamble and it'll depend upon how Las Vegas continues to shift over the course of a decade.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.017 seconds with 13 queries.