Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 03, 2024, 02:38:16 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  Religion & Philosophy (Moderator: Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.)
  Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Parts of the Bible are divinely-inspired, but not all of the Bible is literally true, in historical or scientific understanding or even moral teaching -- and that truth from God can come from other sources besides the Bible too... (see post)
#1
Agree		  
#2
Disagree		  
#3
Unsure		  
#4
Not Christian		  
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results
Total Voters: 28

Author Topic: Opinion of the Bible's literalism/historic-truth/scientific-truth/perfection?  (Read 3018 times)
anvi
anvikshiki
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,400
Netherlands


« on: April 26, 2020, 03:13:01 AM »
If "divinely inspired" means that the books, or parts of them, were directly or indirectly written by God, then I don't believe a single word of the Bible is "divinely inspired."

If "divinely inspired" means that the books of the Bible were written by flawed but searching people who were inspired by the belief in a certain kind of God, then I'd say the whole collection is "divinely inspired." 
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.019 seconds with 12 queries.