Are women less prone to starting conventional warfare than men? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 06, 2024, 03:21:48 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Are women less prone to starting conventional warfare than men? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Are women less prone to starting conventional warfare than men?  (Read 405 times)
If my soul was made of stone
discovolante
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,244
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.13, S: -5.57

« on: July 03, 2022, 01:41:50 AM »

The idea that women are inherently non-violent is just sexism with a seemingly woke coat of paint.

"Women are less prone to violence" is a very different statement than "women are inherently non-violent". One of those things is empirically true, the other is an incorrect conclusion reached from that information.

It is indeed the foundational philosophical undoing of both patriarchal chauvinism and trans-exclusionary radical feminism that they take differences in the typical behavior between sexes and genders to be biologically innate, rather than psychosocially conditioned constructs that persist due to the widespread influence of the former's ideology in powerful institutions and the latter's overcorrection for as much forming a dynamic equilibrium ouroboros in which the conflict is self-serving spectacle for profit and clout.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 10 queries.