Are women less prone to starting conventional warfare than men?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 24, 2024, 10:44:56 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Debate (Moderator: Torie)
  Are women less prone to starting conventional warfare than men?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Are women less prone to starting conventional warfare than men?  (Read 366 times)
Zinneke
JosepBroz
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,108
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: July 01, 2022, 04:40:58 AM »

Discuss this given Boris Johnson's recent comments
Logged
Middle-aged Europe
Old Europe
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,218
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: July 01, 2022, 05:33:30 AM »

Theoretically yes. Practically no.

Explanation: Women who managed to get that far high in power probably ain't.
Logged
Goldwater
Republitarian
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,067
United States


Political Matrix
E: 1.55, S: -4.52

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: July 02, 2022, 06:29:45 PM »

The idea that women are inherently non-violent is just sexism with a seemingly woke coat of paint.
Logged
Ferguson97
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 28,120
United States


P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: July 03, 2022, 12:28:34 AM »

The idea that women are inherently non-violent is just sexism with a seemingly woke coat of paint.

"Women are less prone to violence" is a very different statement than "women are inherently non-violent". One of those things is empirically true, the other is an incorrect conclusion reached from that information.
Logged
If my soul was made of stone
discovolante
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,261
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.13, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: July 03, 2022, 01:41:50 AM »

The idea that women are inherently non-violent is just sexism with a seemingly woke coat of paint.

"Women are less prone to violence" is a very different statement than "women are inherently non-violent". One of those things is empirically true, the other is an incorrect conclusion reached from that information.

It is indeed the foundational philosophical undoing of both patriarchal chauvinism and trans-exclusionary radical feminism that they take differences in the typical behavior between sexes and genders to be biologically innate, rather than psychosocially conditioned constructs that persist due to the widespread influence of the former's ideology in powerful institutions and the latter's overcorrection for as much forming a dynamic equilibrium ouroboros in which the conflict is self-serving spectacle for profit and clout.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,728


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: July 03, 2022, 01:54:57 AM »

In 3 of the 4 groups here, women are more in favor of political violence.

Logged
Former President tack50
tack50
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 11,891
Spain


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: July 03, 2022, 03:36:59 AM »

I believe there was a study a while back regarding the middle ages where women rulers were actually more prone to starting warfare since they lacked the "hands on" experience about how wars look like that men had (since your usual princess would stay all her time in the palace while your usual prince would have to go to war and train to become a soldier)

In any case, Indira Gandhi and Margaret Thatcher (among many others) disapprove of this thread.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 11 queries.