Is industrial capitalism done for in the United States? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 23, 2024, 05:43:50 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Individual Politics (Moderator: The Dowager Mod)
  Is industrial capitalism done for in the United States? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: See above.
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Is industrial capitalism done for in the United States?  (Read 7016 times)
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

« on: July 05, 2009, 09:25:35 PM »

Here's the thing: once these become affordable, everyone will be able to be an entrepreneur, and therefore the larger industries will have become obsolete. The current system will provide the technology to let it happen -- and will therefore "plant the seeds of its own destruction", to borrow an old Marxist concept. It just won't happen the way the Marxists think it will.

These larger systems will alter according to the demands set upon them. Materials still have to be created in order for the simplest "entrepreneurial" endeavor. This system has already negated the seed of it's own destruction, corrected it's supposed contradictions, post-industrialized or not. This system has very little in the way opposition, and could realistically function with a continuous stream of homegrown workers entrepreneurs decentralizing information production into their own homes.

Piece by piece we have already been creating the post-industrial world: individuals can now download and print books; we can download music; we can access all the information in the world from our own fingertips: entrepreneurship has never been easier, and yet it will become even easier yet, the standard of the day by the time we are old men.

Individuals are still beholden to the medium they resort to, to gain whatever it is they need to further their creations. Software, materials, money; very little is actually decentralized that enables people to come out from under the shadow of the older business model. For instance, suffocating copyright laws preventing people from acquiring additional information, lack of funds for upgrading computers, technical knowledge beyond wiki, affordable printing capabilities, etc.

 Much of it is an illusion; this libertarian fantasy of decentralized, “power-in-your-hands” scenario. As each new avenue opens, it becomes another way for business to adapt, and there's nothing to say an increase of DYI offers a paradigm shift that endangers industry. Interdependence is the norm; more so in our post industrial society than in the past. 
Logged
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

« Reply #1 on: July 06, 2009, 11:16:22 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Certainly, which is where the 'left' part of my 'left-libertarian' paradigm fits in.

There's nothing 'left' about it, beside a vague inclusive feeling.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 13 queries.