Israeli Airstrikes on Gaza (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 12, 2024, 11:31:03 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  International General Discussion (Moderators: afleitch, Hash)
  Israeli Airstrikes on Gaza (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Israeli Airstrikes on Gaza  (Read 23018 times)
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

« on: January 04, 2009, 09:36:44 PM »

Both teh IDF and Hamas kill civilians.  The IDF targest Hamas and because of where Hamas operate from, they often kill nearby civilians.  Hamas on the other hand target civilians.

Who are the "real" terrorists?

If we're throwing around that nice buzzword "terrorist", then both fit the description. I don't exactly see how bombing a university counts as an act of "self defense".
Logged
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

« Reply #1 on: January 06, 2009, 12:57:41 PM »

All accidents as well.  If those bastards in Hamas hadn't started this stupidity those civilians would still be alive.

Yeah, it's always hamas. Israel is innocent in this.
Logged
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

« Reply #2 on: January 10, 2009, 05:03:37 PM »

All accidents as well.  If those bastards in Hamas hadn't started this stupidity those civilians would still be alive.

Yeah, it's always hamas. Israel is innocent in this.

I'm glad you see it our way, Earth.

I hope that's sarcasm.
Logged
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

« Reply #3 on: January 19, 2009, 03:26:49 PM »

And in the end Israel killed 100x as many people as Hamas did during this time. Now that's certainly a proportional response!
By that logic, the invasion of Afghanistan was a grossly disproportionate response to the 9/11 attacks. Do you oppose it? Also, the Pacific War against Japan was an extremely "disproportionate" response to Pearl Harbor. Again, do you think it was wrong?

I don't quite understand the need to use "proportionality" as a response, unless we're specifically framing this conflict with the propagandized idea of "self defense" in mind.

To answer your questions above, Dirty South, (although it wasn't directed at me, eh, what the hell) I say yes.
Logged
Earth
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,548


Political Matrix
E: -9.61, S: -9.83

« Reply #4 on: January 21, 2009, 03:22:55 PM »

A few interesting articles:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/jan/21/gaza-phosphorus-shells

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/1057485.html
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.025 seconds with 10 queries.